Requests the state Department of Education to identify and quantify all curriculum development costs
Impact
The resolution seeks to inform the House of Representatives' evaluation of how state funds are utilized in the educational sector. By gathering comprehensive data on past expenditures related to curriculum development, it aims to enable better decision-making regarding future funding and educational policy. This step could potentially lead to more efficient spending on educational resources, ultimately benefiting students and teachers in Louisiana.
Summary
House Resolution 176 urges the Louisiana Department of Education to conduct a study on the costs associated with curriculum development. The resolution specifically requests data on the historical funding of content standards, curriculum evaluation, and professional development required for effective curriculum implementation. The department is required to submit a written report detailing these findings to the House of Representatives by February 3, 2023. This resolution reflects a need for transparency and accountability in the allocation of state funds towards public education.
Sentiment
The sentiment surrounding HR176 is largely positive, with an emphasis on the importance of understanding financial commitments to education. Stakeholders view the resolution as a proactive move towards ensuring effective use of resources within the state's education system. The bipartisan support for evaluating educational costs indicates a consensus on the need for financial oversight and effective curriculum implementation.
Contention
While HR176 has generally been well-received, some expressions of concern may arise regarding the potential implications of studying the costs associated with curriculum development. Dialogue amongst legislators suggests apprehension about how the findings might influence future funding decisions or policy changes. Nonetheless, the resolution primarily aims to enhance clarity and support for educational funding, minimizing substantial points of contention.
Requests that the state Department of Education study and submit a report relative to transparency in education with respect to parental access to instructional materials
Requests the state Department of Education, the State Board of Elementary and Secondary Education, the Board of Regents, and postsecondary education management boards to promote artificial intelligence education for students and to encourage professional development relative to artificial intelligence for faculty and staff
Requests the state Department of Education and the Department of Transportation and Development to study the feasibility and effectiveness of installing seat belts on school buses
Requests that the Bd. of Regents and the State Bd. of Elementary and Secondary Education study the possibility of allowing a course in African American Studies to satisfy certain curriculum requirements
Urges and requests the Board of Regents and the state Board of Elementary and Secondary Education to include computer coding and American Sign Language as course equivalents for TOPS core curriculum and high school graduation requirements.