Louisiana Senate Bill SCR2

Louisiana 2022 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/14/22
• Passed: 3/14/22
• Engrossed: 3/14/22

Caption

Invites Chief Justice John Weimer of the Louisiana Supreme Court to address a joint session of the legislature on Tuesday, March 15, 2022, at 3:00 p.m.

Impact

The passage of SCR2 does not directly alter state laws but reinforces the connection between the arms of state government. It highlights the importance of communication and cooperation between the legislature and the judiciary, which can foster a better understanding of the judicial system's role in the legislative process. By inviting the Chief Justice to speak, the resolution aims to enhance transparency and underscore the judiciary's influence on legislative matters in Louisiana.

Summary

Senate Concurrent Resolution No. 2 (SCR2), introduced by Senator Mizell, serves as an invitation to Chief Justice John Weimer of the Louisiana Supreme Court to address a joint session of the legislature. This resolution is notably ceremonial, indicating a recognition of the judicial branch and encouraging dialogue between the judiciary and the legislative bodies of the state. The scheduled address is set for March 15, 2022, at 3:00 p.m., emphasizing the legislative's respect and acknowledgment of the Supreme Court's role in state governance.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SCR2 is largely positive, reflecting a bipartisan acknowledgment of the Supreme Court's authority. By facilitating this address, legislators demonstrate a commitment to fostering collaboration and open dialogue with the state's judiciary. This collegial approach is seen as beneficial for the legislative process and state governance overall, indicating a shared goal of maintaining a balanced governmental structure.

Contention

While SCR2 is a straightforward invitation, it may present an opportunity for enhanced discussions on important judicial issues facing Louisiana. However, as it is primarily a ceremonial resolution, there is little contention surrounding its adoption. The unanimous support indicated by the voting history—27 yeas and 0 nays—suggests that it was regarded as a non-controversial and cooperative measure among the members of the legislature.