Louisiana 2022 Regular Session

Louisiana Senate Bill SCR6

Introduced
3/14/22  
Introduced
3/14/22  
Refer
3/15/22  
Refer
3/15/22  
Report Pass
5/2/22  
Passed
5/3/22  
Passed
5/3/22  
Engrossed
5/4/22  
Engrossed
5/4/22  
Refer
5/5/22  
Refer
5/5/22  
Refer
5/11/22  
Refer
5/11/22  
Refer
5/12/22  
Report Pass
5/18/22  

Caption

Creates a task force to study and make recommendations relative to tenure policies of public postsecondary education institutions.

Impact

The implications of SCR6, if fully implemented, would necessitate a comprehensive evaluation of existing tenure policies across public postsecondary institutions in Louisiana. The task force is tasked with studying the merits and necessity of these policies and providing recommendations for any legislative changes needed. This could lead to adjustments in how tenure is granted and maintained, impacting faculty job security and the academic landscape in the state.

Summary

Senate Concurrent Resolution No. 6 (SCR6) establishes a Task Force on Tenure in Public Postsecondary Education to review and make recommendations regarding tenure policies for public postsecondary institutions in Louisiana. The bill underscores the significance of tenure as a mechanism that supports academic freedom and intellectual diversity, allowing faculty to conduct research and express controversial ideas without fear of reprisal. Its aim is to ensure that students receive a well-rounded education that includes a spectrum of viewpoints.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SCR6 appears to endorse a collaborative approach to reviewing tenure policies, emphasizing the importance of academic freedom. Supporters herald the task force as a step towards fostering rigorous scholarship and broadening the discourse within educational institutions. However, there may be concerns among some faculty members about potential threats to their job security and academic independence, rightfully causing apprehension regarding any proposed changes.

Contention

Notable points of contention likely include the balance between maintaining academic rigor and protecting faculty rights. While the intent is to ensure robust and inclusive academic discourse, some may argue that revisiting tenure policies could lead to vulnerabilities for faculty in expressing dissenting opinions. The ongoing discussions may reflect broader national debates about academic freedom, inclusivity, and the role of education in shaping societal values.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

NJ S4011

Requires registration of postsecondary education debt creditors; establishes protections for borrowers.

CA AB2192

State-funded research: grant requirements.

CA SB3

Office of Higher Education Coordination, Accountability, and Performance.

CA AB1142

Community colleges: costs for using facilities or grounds.

MS SB2517

"MS Intercollegiate Athletics Compensation Rights Act" and "Uniform Athletes Agent Act"; bring forward.

CA AB1098

Postsecondary education: undergraduate and graduate students: pregnancy or pregnancy-related issues.

CA AB1905

Public postsecondary education: employment: settlements, informal resolutions, and retreat rights.

CA AB1575

Public postsecondary education: students codes of conduct: advisers.