Requests the Board of Regents to study inequalities in current tuition at four-year schools
Impact
The resolution is significant as it highlights and encourages the examination of the current tuition policies under the GRAD Act, which allows for substantial increases per year until tuition reaches the average of peer institutions. By addressing the issue of tuition disparity, the resolution aims to ensure that all public universities in Louisiana can provide fair access to education while maintaining financial competitiveness. If the Board of Regents successfully implements the study and proposes amendments to the GRAD Act, it could lead to substantial changes in how tuition is structured and justified across the state's public universities.
Summary
House Concurrent Resolution No. 110 (HCR110) urges the Board of Regents to study the disparity in tuition fees charged at public four-year universities in Louisiana compared to their peers in the Southern Regional Education Board. This resolution aims to develop a proposal that amends the existing Granting Resources and Autonomy for Diplomas (GRAD) Act in a way that mitigates this disparity, ultimately leading to a more equitable tuition structure among institutions. HCR110 acknowledges the existing inequalities in tuition rates, where some universities charge significantly less than others, potentially leading to unfair advantages or disadvantages among institutions.
Sentiment
The general sentiment around HCR110 has been supportive, particularly among legislators who acknowledge the need for a comprehensive analysis of tuition rates. The resolution reflects a consensus that the current system may not serve all institutions equally, which could resonate positively with students and educational stakeholders. However, there may be contention as well, particularly from institutions that currently benefit from higher tuition rates, who may resist changes that could impact their funding and operational capabilities.
Contention
One notable point of contention arises from the potential implications of rectifying tuition disparities. While the resolution seeks to promote equity, there are concerns about how any changes to the GRAD Act may affect institutional funding and financial aid strategies. Some institutions fear that equalizing tuition rates could lead to financial strain or loss of identity, as educational resources, scholarship offerings, and student demographics vary widely across universities. Thus, the resolution calls for a measured approach to studying these disparities and crafting solutions that consider the unique needs of each institution.
Requests that the Board of Regents study the feasibility of implementing a college tuition program that would allow students to pay tuition after leaving college
Requests the Board of Regents to restructure the performance-based funding formula and not to allocate funding based on performance until improvements to the formula are made
Provides for a Board of Regents program under which postsecondary institutions agree to achieve certain standards in exchange for authority to increase tuition and for exemption from certain limitations (EN INCREASE SG RV See Note)
Requests the Board of Regents to study the feasibility of delegating tuition-setting authority to the state's public postsecondary professional schools.
Relating to accountability of institutions of higher education, including educator preparation programs, and online institution resumes for public institutions of higher education.
Revises calculation of student financial need and provides circumstances for reduction of financial aid at institutions of higher education and proprietary institutions.
Revises calculation of student financial need and provides circumstances for reduction of financial aid at institutions of higher education and proprietary institutions.
Revises calculation of student financial need and provides circumstances for reduction of financial aid at institutions of higher education and proprietary institutions.