Provides for the prohibition of the use of non-OEM aftermarket parts at the direction of an insurer when such parts affect the safe operation of the vehicle or otherwise endanger the health, safety and welfare of the public
Impact
By enforcing stricter regulations on the use of non-OEM aftermarket parts, HB 337 brings significant changes to existing insurance and automotive repair laws in Louisiana. The bill compels repair facilities and insurers to provide written disclosures to claimants about the use of non-OEM parts, ensuring transparency. If enacted, it will prohibit insurers from specifying non-OEM parts, requiring them to disclose this information beforehand. This move is considered a step towards better consumer rights in the automotive repair sector.
Summary
House Bill 337 aims to regulate the usage of non-original equipment manufacturer (non-OEM) aftermarket parts in vehicle repairs directed by insurers. The bill establishes that insurers cannot mandate the use of these parts when such use could compromise the safe operation of a vehicle or endanger public health and safety. This legislation seeks to enhance consumer protection by ensuring that only safe, reliable parts are used in vehicle repairs, thereby safeguarding vehicle occupants and the general public from potential hazards associated with substandard parts.
Sentiment
The sentiment regarding HB 337 appears to be generally positive among consumer advocacy groups and safety advocates who support increased regulations to protect vehicle safety. Proponents argue that the bill addresses serious concerns about the integrity and reliability of vehicle repairs, especially in cases where non-OEM parts could jeopardize safety. However, there may be some contention from insurance companies and repair facilities that see this regulation as an additional administrative burden or as limiting options for consumers looking for cost-effective repair solutions.
Contention
While the bill is largely focused on enhancing safety and consumer transparency, points of contention may arise regarding the potential financial impact on repair facilities that prefer to use non-OEM parts due to cost considerations. Insurance companies may also argue that constraining the use of non-OEM parts could lead to higher repair costs, which may ultimately be passed on to consumers. Overall, the legislative discourse surrounding HB 337 highlights the tension between ensuring public safety and maintaining consumer choices in the automotive repair marketplace.
Prohibits insurance companies from refusing to use after market parts that are greater than 48 months and less than 72 months from the date of manufacture, provided the repairer has written consent from the owner of the vehicle.
Prohibits insurance companies from refusing to use after market parts that are greater than 48 months and less than 72 months from the date of manufacture, provided the repairer has written consent from the owner of the vehicle.
Requires a motor vehicle repairman to disclose to customers that parts used in an auto body repair may not be new, original equipment manufacturer parts. (8/1/15)