Provides for the calling of a constitutional convention for the purpose of revising the constitution in order to provide for state revenue and finance and matters relating thereto. (2/3 - CA13s2) (gov sig) (EG INCREASE GF EX See Note)
Impact
The impact of SB 393 is significant as it seeks to reshape how the state handles its budgetary practices and finances, potentially leading to more agile responses to economic challenges. Proponents argue that the existing constitution has been amended numerous times without fully addressing contemporary fiscal issues, such as the allocation of resources for healthcare and education. By convening the convention and focusing on these financial aspects, the state aims to enhance its economic competitiveness and better manage its budgetary constraints.
Summary
Senate Bill 393 calls for a constitutional convention in Louisiana specifically aimed at revising the state constitution to address matters related to state revenue and finance. The convention is set to convene on July 10, 2016, and is composed of 144 delegates, all of whom are currently serving as members of the state's legislature. The bill outlines the specific scope of the convention, emphasizing that substantive changes can only be made to articles related to state finance and allocation of funds, thus limiting the topics that delegates can address during the convention.
Sentiment
Overall, the sentiment surrounding SB 393 appears to embody a sense of urgency among lawmakers regarding the need for constitutional reform in financial matters. Supporters view the bill as a pivotal opportunity to modernize the state's financial governance, ensuring that it aligns more closely with the current needs of Louisiana's citizens. Conversely, there may be some apprehension concerning the limited scope of the convention, as it excludes broader discussions on other constitutional amendments that could be beneficial or necessary for further reforms.
Contention
Notably, the major points of contention include the restriction of the convention's authority to only financial matters, which some might view as overly narrow. Critics could argue that such limitations prevent more comprehensive reforms that address other pressing issues within the state. Additionally, there may be concerns about the convention's procedures and the potential for political maneuvering among delegates as they navigate the complex matters of state finance. The requirement for substantial changes to be approved by a simple majority in a future vote by the electorate could also become a focal point of debate.