Memorializes congress to pass the Disability Integration Act of 2017
If enacted, the Disability Integration Act would create a legal right for individuals with disabilities to receive the necessary supports to live in the community rather than being relegated to institutional settings. This would align state policies with the civil rights protections established under the ADA and help reduce the burden on individuals who currently find themselves isolated due to insufficient support services. It also aims to decrease the significant financial costs associated with institutional care by promoting more cost-effective community-based solutions.
House Concurrent Resolution 40 (HCR40) is a resolution that memorializes the United States Congress to pass the Disability Integration Act of 2017. The need for such legislation arises from ongoing concerns that individuals with disabilities continue to experience segregation and discrimination, especially through institutionalization. HCR40 emphasizes the importance of ensuring adequate community-based long-term services and supports, which are essential for individuals with disabilities to live independently and participate fully in society, as originally envisioned by the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990.
The sentiment surrounding HCR40 appeared to be overwhelmingly supportive among the legislators, highlighted by a final vote in favor that showed no opposition, with 85 yeas and 0 nays. The discussions may have been driven by a broader recognition of the injustices faced by individuals with disabilities and a commitment to uphold their rights, suggesting a bipartisan acknowledgment of the importance of disability rights within the legislative body.
Despite the favorable reception in the Louisiana legislature, there may be potential contention at the federal level regarding the passage of the Disability Integration Act. Opponents of similar initiatives may argue about the implications for state funding and service delivery approaches. Additionally, discussions on how best to implement community-based services and the adequacy of funding may arise, overshadowing the resolution's intent and highlighting the complexities involved in reforming disability services.