The proposed legislation is significant as it expands the range of eligible noncredit courses funded by the state, thereby allowing community colleges to receive funding for tutoring services that they currently do not receive. Supporters of AB 1935 believe that funding for tutoring will directly contribute to improved student retention and success rates. By facilitating access to necessary academic help, the bill seeks to create a more conducive learning environment for students, especially those who require extra support.
Summary
Assembly Bill 1935, introduced by Assembly Member Irwin, aims to amend the Education Code to include supervised tutoring for basic skills and degree-applicable and transfer-level courses among the noncredit courses eligible for state apportionment funding. This change is intended to enhance the educational offerings available to students attending California's community colleges by providing additional financial support for tutoring programs that are critical to student success, particularly for those who may struggle with foundational academic skills.
Sentiment
The sentiment surrounding AB 1935 is generally positive among supporters who argue that the additional funding will bolster the community college system and help many students achieve their educational goals. They contend that improving access to tutoring contributes to a stronger and more educated workforce. However, some concerns may arise regarding the implementation of the bill or the allocation of sufficient funds to meet the expected demand for tutoring services, which could lead to challenges in execution.
Contention
While the overall sentiment is in favor of AB 1935, discussions may also uncover points of contention regarding how state apportionment funding will be distributed and regulated. Questions may arise about the criteria that will be established for what constitutes 'supervised tutoring' and how colleges will ensure compliance with these regulations. Additionally, ensuring that the added funds are effectively utilized to foster academic support and do not become a burden on the institutions’ administrative requirements is likely to be an ongoing topic of debate.