California 2017-2018 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB1975

Introduced
1/31/18  
Refer
2/8/18  
Refer
2/8/18  
Report Pass
4/2/18  
Report Pass
4/2/18  
Refer
4/3/18  
Report Pass
4/12/18  
Report Pass
4/12/18  
Refer
4/17/18  
Report Pass
5/1/18  
Report Pass
5/1/18  
Refer
5/2/18  
Refer
5/2/18  
Refer
5/9/18  
Refer
5/9/18  
Report Pass
5/25/18  

Caption

Nuisance: odors.

Impact

The legislation not only seeks to improve the management of odor complaints but also aligns local agencies and organizations towards a common goal of addressing community concerns regarding air quality. By imposing collaborative procedures and investigative requirements on local jurisdictions, AB1975 emphasizes the responsibility of these agencies in handling odor-related complaints more effectively. The bill reflects a significant move towards maintaining public health and environmental standards in California, particularly in regions affected by industrial activities.

Summary

AB1975, introduced by Assembly Member Chu, addresses the issue of nuisance odors in the County of Santa Clara by establishing the South Bay Interagency Odor Taskforce. This task force is tasked with identifying sources of odor emissions and managing complaints received from several cities, including Milpitas, Fremont, Santa Clara, and San Jose. Additionally, the bill mandates the development of protocols for joint inspections of odor complaints. The goal is to streamline the process of addressing nuisances that affect air quality and community well-being in the region.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding AB1975 appears to be generally positive among environmental and public health advocates, who appreciate the proactive approach to managing nuisance odors. However, there might be concerns from local agencies regarding the additional responsibilities that the task force structure will impose. The proverbial balancing act is evident, as stakeholders navigate the necessity of environmental regulation while addressing local agency capacities.

Contention

A noteworthy point of contention arises from the potential economic burden on local agencies that may need to allocate resources for the enhanced investigative processes and coordination required by the bill. Additionally, the temporary nature of the taskforce, which is set to be inoperative after July 1, 2022, and repealed by January 1, 2023, raises questions about the sustainability of such initiatives. Legislators may debate whether the estimated costs for maintaining this task force are justified and whether the mission can achieve its intended effects in the limited timeframe.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB340

Firearms: armed prohibited persons.

CA AB247

Public health: childhood lead poisoning: Lead Advisory Task Force.

CA AB1466

Employee classification: professional classification: specified educational employees.

CA AB2273

The California Age-Appropriate Design Code Act.

HI HB1838

Relating To A Coastal Zone Program.

HI SB2814

Relating To A Coastal Zone Program.

CA SB802

Emerging vehicle technology: advisory study group.