Hawaii Senate Bill SB2962

Hawaii 2022 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/21/22
• Refer: 1/24/22
• Report Pass: 2/18/22
• Refer: 2/18/22

Caption

Proposing An Amendment To Article I Of The Constitution Of The State Of Hawaii To Recognize And Protect The Inherent And Inalienable Right Of All People To Clean Water And Air And Healthy Ecosystems, Including Climate, And To The Preservation Of The Natural, Cultural, Scenic, And Healthful Qualities Of The Environment.

Impact

If enacted, this amendment would reinforce the state's commitment to environmental protection at a constitutional level. It sets forth a clear declaration that the rights of its citizens to a clean environment are inalienable and should not be infringed upon. This could lead to heightened regulatory scrutiny of environmental practices and enhance the legal framework for environmental advocacy and accountability. The bill reflects a broader trend towards recognizing environmental rights as a fundamental civil right, aligning local laws with such values.

Summary

Senate Bill 2962 proposes a significant amendment to Article I of the Constitution of Hawaii aimed at recognizing and protecting the fundamental right of all individuals, including future generations, to clean air and water, a healthful environment and climate, as well as the preservation of the state's natural and cultural resources. The bill emphasizes the essential relationship that native Hawaiians have with their environment and the importance of safeguarding these ecosystems for both current and future residents of the state.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment surrounding SB 2962 is largely positive among environmental advocates and those concerned with sustainability. Supporters argue that the constitutional protection of environmental rights is crucial for maintaining Hawaii's unique ecosystems and addressing climate challenges. However, there are concerns about potential conflicts with existing land use and development regulations, which may arise from the added constitutional protections, indicating a need for careful balance in implementation.

Contention

Notable points of contention include concerns about how the amendment might affect economic development and property rights. Critics may argue that such a broad acknowledgment of environmental rights could hinder development projects and impose stricter regulatory requirements on businesses. As the bill moves forward, it will be essential to ascertain how these environmental protections can coexist with economic growth initiatives to reach a consensus among diverse stakeholders.