Hawaii House Bill HR61

Hawaii 2023 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/9/23
• Refer: 3/15/23
• Report Pass: 3/30/23
• Passed: 3/30/23

Caption

Urging The Department Of Education To Prioritize Funding For The English Learner Program In Public Schools To Address The Increasing Population Of English Learner Students.

Impact

The discussion surrounding HR61 reveals a growing concern over the educational achievements of English learners in Hawaii. Reports indicate a worrying decline in the percentage of these students on track to gain language proficiency, dropping from 41% in 2018 to just 28% in 2021-2022. By urging for more funding, HR61 seeks to address these challenges, ensuring that the English Learner Program has the necessary resources to effectively support these students and combat the upward trend of insufficient educational outcomes. The recommendation aligns with federal mandates under the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which require educational institutions to provide equitable access to resources for all students.

Summary

House Bill HR61 urges the Department of Education in Hawaii to prioritize funding for the English Learner Program in public schools. This bill comes in response to a significant increase in the population of English learner students within the state. The English Learner Program aims to provide services that help students with limited English proficiency attain a higher level of English language skills, thereby ensuring they can meet the same academic standards as their peers. The program is designed to advance educational opportunities and promote academic success among these students, which is crucial in a diverse educational landscape.

Contention

The potential points of contention surrounding HR61 may revolve around budget allocations and the prioritization of resources within the Department of Education. There could be debates regarding whether increased funding for the English Learner Program would detract from funding in other critical areas within public education. Stakeholders might express differing opinions on the effectiveness of current programs versus the urgency of addressing funding disparities. Additionally, there could be discussions about the broader implications of such funding on the educational infrastructure and the responsibilities of the state toward all student demographics.