Us Congress House Bill HJR59

Us Congress 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 4/25/23
• Refer: 4/25/23

Caption

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Department of Labor relating to "Adverse Effect Wage Rate Methodology for the Temporary Employment of H-2A Nonimmigrants in Non-Range Occupations in the United States".

Impact

The passage of HJR59 would have substantial implications for labor regulations affecting nonimmigrant agricultural workers. Should the resolution be approved, it would invalidate the Department's recent rules, potentially maintaining the status quo in wage determination methods used previously. Proponents of the bill argue that the Department's changes could negatively impact the agricultural sector, particularly in states that heavily rely on H-2A workers. Critics, however, might assert that maintaining lower wage rates for these workers undercuts local labor markets and may lead to exploitation, reflecting an ongoing tension between labor rights and agricultural productivity needs.

Summary

HJR59 seeks congressional disapproval of a specific rule submitted by the Department of Labor, which pertains to the 'Adverse Effect Wage Rate Methodology' for the temporary employment of H-2A nonimmigrants in non-range occupations. This resolution was introduced in the House of Representatives on April 25, 2023, and highlights concerns regarding the wage rates that are to be paid to these temporary workers. The bill essentially aims to eliminate the new wage rate methodology proposed by the Department, thereby preventing its implementation throughout the United States. This underscores a significant focus on the regulations surrounding agricultural labor and the employment of nonimmigrant workers.

Contention

Debates surrounding HJR59 indicate a division among lawmakers and stakeholders invested in agricultural labor. Supporters of the resolution argue for the necessity of keeping wage rates manageable for farmers, asserting that excessive wage requirements could jeopardize production and economic viability in the agricultural sector. However, opponents raise concerns that such actions perpetuate a race to the bottom regarding labor standards, effectively diminishing wage protections and possibly leading to adverse working conditions for nonimmigrant laborers. The ongoing discussion about the balance between economic needs and worker rights remains a significant point of contention.