Us Congress Senate Bill SJR61

Us Congress 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/7/24
• Refer: 2/7/24
• Engrossed: 4/15/24

Caption

A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Federal Highway Administration relating to "National Performance Management Measures; Assessing Performance of the National Highway System, Greenhouse Gas Emissions Measure".

Impact

The passage of SJR61 signifies a shift in how federal highway emission regulations might be enforced or interpreted. By disapproving the Federal Highway Administration's rule, Congress is asserting more control over the criteria used to measure national performance in transportation. This action suggests that states may face less stringent requirements regarding greenhouse gas emissions from highway systems, impacting broader environmental goals related to climate change mitigation. As a result, this could potentially lead to conflicts between state-level initiatives aimed at reducing carbon footprints and federal directives establishing lower performance standards.

Summary

SJR61 is a joint resolution aimed at disapproving a rule established by the Federal Highway Administration concerning the assessment of performance measures related to the National Highway System and greenhouse gas emissions. The resolution asserts that the specified rule should have no force or effect, reflecting Congress's power to oversee and influence regulatory measures that impact national transportation policies. The action taken through this resolution illustrates Congress's intent to limit or negate federal regulatory authority, particularly in environmental matters related to infrastructure.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SJR61 was mixed, with supporters advocating for greater legislative oversight of regulatory measures that they believe may be overly burdensome or misaligned with state priorities. Those opposed expressed concerns about the implications for environmental sustainability and the federal government's role in addressing climate change. The debate highlighted fundamental differences in approach toward environmental regulation, showcasing tensions between immediate economic considerations and long-term ecological responsibility.

Contention

Notable points of contention surfaced during deliberations on SJR61, with critics arguing that disapproving the FHWA's rule could undermine efforts to accurately assess and improve highway performance in respect to greenhouse gas emissions. Supporters countered by emphasizing the need for local control and the belief that Congress should play a direct role in shaping regulations that affect their constituents. This highlights an ongoing dialogue about the balance between federal authority and state autonomy, particularly in the realm of environmental governance.