Michigan House Bill HB4153

Michigan 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/28/23
• Refer: 2/28/23
• Report Pass: 5/23/23
• Engrossed: 6/14/23
• Refer: 6/15/23
• Report Pass: 6/27/23
• Enrolled: 6/28/23
• Chaptered: 7/18/23
• Passed: 7/18/23

Caption

Transportation: railroads; priorities for local grade separation fund; provide for. Amends 1951 PA 51 (MCL 247.651 - 247.675) by adding sec. 11j. TIE BAR WITH: SB 0125'23

Impact

The enactment of HB4153 is intended to advance public safety and efficiency in transportation across Michigan. By prioritizing railroad crossing projects that are in close proximity to vital infrastructures, such as manufacturing facilities and emergency services, the bill aims to improve access and reduce the risk of accidents at these crossings. This targeted approach is expected to direct resources effectively where they are needed most, potentially lowering the number of incidents involving train-related accidents and improving overall community safety.

Summary

House Bill 4153 amends the 1951 Public Act 51, which deals with the classification and management of public roads, streets, and highways in Michigan. This bill specifically adds section 11j, directing the state department to establish parameters for prioritizing funding applications for railroad crossing projects under the local grade separation grant program. The goal is to enhance safety and traffic efficiency at railroad crossings by ensuring that high-priority crossings receive the necessary improvements funded through these grants.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB4153 appears to be generally positive, particularly among legislators concerned with enhancing transportation safety. The bill garnered support in the Senate, evidenced by a unanimous vote, indicating bipartisan agreement on its importance. Stakeholders involved in transportation safety, including advocacy groups and local governmental agencies, have also expressed optimism regarding the potential benefits of addressing high-risk railway crossings.

Contention

Notable points of contention may arise regarding local versus state control over transportation funding and priorities. While the bill aims to streamline the approval process for essential safety projects, some may argue about the need for local input in decision-making processes related to their transport infrastructure needs. Ensuring that the parameters for project prioritization align with the unique needs of diverse communities may be a key topic in future discussions related to this legislation.