Wisconsin Senate Bill SB141

Wisconsin 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/23/23
• Refer: 3/23/23
• Failed: 4/15/24

Caption

Third-party processing of applications for occupational therapists and occupational therapy assistants and granting rulemaking authority. (FE)

Impact

If enacted, SB141 will significantly alter the current framework for managing occupational therapy licensure in Wisconsin. By assigning the processing of applications to a third-party organization, the bill seeks to modernize and improve the efficiency of the application process, ensuring faster responses for applicants. Furthermore, it authorizes the third-party entity to set fees, subject to oversight from the Joint Committee on Finance, which could also help regulate any fluctuations in costs associated with obtaining a license, thereby providing a measure of financial predictability for applicants.

Summary

Senate Bill 141 focuses on the licensure process for occupational therapists and occupational therapy assistants by introducing a third-party processing system. The bill mandates the Department of Safety and Professional Services to contract with a third-party entity which will manage applications for licensure, including the collection of fees and the verification of applicants' qualifications. This approach aims to streamline the licensure process by allowing quicker decisions and enhanced efficiency in handling applications, thereby potentially addressing existing backlogs in occupational therapy licensing.

Contention

Despite its focus on efficiency, SB141 has raised concerns among some legislators and occupational therapy professionals about accountability and oversight. Critics argue that outsourcing the licensure process might lead to a lack of direct oversight of standards and practices that are crucial in the healthcare field. Additionally, the mechanism for fee adjustments being controlled by a third-party raises questions on transparency and the potential for increased costs to applicants. Stakeholders are particularly worried about the implications for quality control in the profession, which could be compromised under such a system.