Counties: employees and officers; request for transcript and abstract of paper or record; modify. Amends sec. 1 of 1895 PA 161 (MCL 48.101).
Impact
The effect of SB 0705 will be significant on the fees associated with public records in Michigan. By standardizing the fees charged by county treasurers for various records, the bill seeks to streamline the process and potentially reduce costs for individuals requesting these documents. Importantly, the bill permits electronic requests at a capped fee, which could lead to increased access to public records while maintaining reasonable costs. This could also enhance transparency by providing better access to important public information.
Summary
Senate Bill 0705 aims to amend the 1895 PA 161 statute, regarding the fees that county treasurers can charge for providing transcripts and abstracts of records. The bill outlines specific fees for different types of documents, such as abstracts of taxes, copies of documents, and certificates. For example, the proposed fees include 25 cents per year for tax abstracts and 25 cents per 100 words for document copies, while a minimum overall fee of 50 cents is mandated. The bill further allows charter counties with populations over 2 million to impose different fees, provided they do not exceed the cost of the service provided.
Sentiment
Discussions around SB 0705 reflect a generally positive sentiment among supporters, who argue that the standardized fee structure will improve efficiency and accessibility of records for residents. Proponents emphasize that easier access to public records is essential for transparency and accountability in local government. However, there might be concerns regarding the adequacy of fees to cover administrative costs, particularly in larger counties, where variations could be more pronounced.
Contention
While the bill has garnered support, notable points of contention include the implications for counties that may struggle to cover the costs associated with providing these records, especially if fees are limited. Any mandates that restrict fees could lead to a potential burden on county finances. Moreover, there are concerns about the effectiveness of electronic record access versus traditional methods, raising questions about implementation logistics and the potential impact on traditional record-keeping practices.
Abstracting; modifying requirements under the Oklahoma Abstractors Act; providing exception for determination of unnecessary delay; increasing certain civil penalties.
Abstracting; modifying requirements under the Oklahoma Abstractors Act; providing exception for determination of unnecessary delay; increasing certain civil penalties. Effective date.
Traffic control: violations; penalties for operating a vehicle while sending or receiving a message on an electronic wireless device; enhance. Amends secs. 320a, 602b, 602c & 732 of 1949 PA 300 (MCL 257.320a et seq.).