Kentucky House Bill HB262

Kentucky 2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/16/24
• Refer: 1/16/24
• Refer: 1/22/24
• Report Pass: 2/1/24
• Engrossed: 2/2/24
• Refer: 2/2/24
• Refer: 2/6/24

Caption

AN ACT amending the 2022-2024 State/Executive Branch biennial budget, making an appropriation therefor, and declaring an emergency.

Impact

By amending the existing budget to include these appropriations, HB 262 aims to ensure that Kentucky is better equipped to respond to emergencies. The funding would be accessible for crucial sectors such as emergency management and public safety, particularly in times of increased natural disasters. Moreover, a provision allows for an additional $1,000,000 from the surplus for operational costs related to the inmate population, indicating a responsiveness to unforeseen circumstances in corrections management as well.

Summary

House Bill 262 proposes amendments to the 2022-2024 State/Executive Branch biennial budget, focusing on allocating funds specifically for disaster and emergency aid. This legislation sets forth an appropriation of up to $50,000,000 from the General Fund to match federal aid for disasters or emergencies declared by the President. The bill emphasizes the necessity of being prepared for unforeseen disasters and the critical role of state funding in supporting these efforts.

Sentiment

Sentiment surrounding HB 262 appears generally supportive, particularly among legislators focused on public safety and disaster preparedness. The anticipation of future disasters and the state’s need for robust response mechanisms resonate well with both sponsors of the bill and constituents who prioritize safety and security. However, there might be some apprehension regarding the efficiency and potential oversight of these funds in the long-term budget planning.

Contention

While the bill primarily aims to safeguard financial resources for emergencies, discussions may arise regarding the implications of increased funding in corrections versus emergency services. Critics from various advocacy groups might challenge the allocation choices, advocating for more comprehensive disaster planning and resource distribution tailored directly to local community needs rather than a broad-strokes approach. The declaration of an emergency within the bill also suggests urgency which could limit legislative debate on allocation priorities.