Texas House Bill HB66

Texas 2021 - 87th 3rd C.S.

Caption

Relating to requirements for the use on this state's international border of security cameras and for camera data storage from those cameras.

Impact

The bill, if enacted, would directly impact contracts related to border security technology, potentially limiting the options available to state agencies due to the requirement for U.S.-made cameras and domestic data storage solutions. By prioritizing American companies for manufacturing and data management, the legislation is intended to bolster local economies and enhance the security of sensitive information. This could, however, raise concerns about increased costs or reduced competitiveness in securing technological solutions if fewer options are available due to these restrictions.

Summary

House Bill 66 aims to establish stringent requirements regarding the use of security cameras and data storage for programs that monitor Texas' international border. Specifically, the bill mandates that security cameras used for border monitoring must be manufactured in the United States and that data gathered from these cameras must be stored on devices located within the U.S. and operated by American companies. This measure underscores a commitment to national security and domestic manufacturing, aiming to ensure that sensitive surveillance data is handled within the country's borders.

Contention

Members of the legislature have raised various points of contention regarding HB66. Proponents argue for the necessity of securing sensitive data related to border management and assert that domestic production ensures better oversight and accountability. Critics, however, may perceive these constraints as restrictive and potentially costly, questioning whether such limitations will substantially improve border security or simply complicate access to effective technologies that might not be U.S.-made. Consequently, discussions surrounding the bill may reflect broader debates about governmental sourcing policies and national security versus market competition.