Georgia Senate Bill SB40

Georgia 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/28/25
• Refer: 1/29/25
• Report Pass: 2/18/25
• Engrossed: 2/26/25
• Report Pass: 3/18/25
• Enrolled: 4/10/25
• Chaptered: 5/14/25
• Passed: 5/14/25

Caption

Secondary Metals Recyclers; the definition of the term "used, detached catalytic converters" to said article; provide for applicability

Impact

The implications of SB 40 on state law are significant, as it seeks to create stricter regulations around the buying and selling of used catalytic converters to ensure these transactions are conducted legally and transparently. It prohibits cash transactions for catalytic converters and limits the transfer of these items to registered recyclers only. The introduction of caps on cash payments and the requirement for vouchers aim to enhance accountability and reduce illegal activities in the secondary metals market.

Summary

Senate Bill 40 aims to amend provisions concerning secondary metals recyclers in Georgia, specifically focusing on the regulation of used, detached catalytic converters. The bill revises the definitions associated with these components and imposes new registration requirements for secondary metals recyclers, establishing strict compliance guidelines. This includes detailed record-keeping and reporting of transactions related to catalytic converters, reflective of an effort to curb metal theft and illegal dumping of these materials, which have raised environmental concerns.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB 40 appears generally supportive among lawmakers concerned with reducing crime related to metal theft. Advocates argue that these measures reflect a proactive approach to addressing a problem that has escalated with rising metal prices. However, there is some apprehension from the recycling industry regarding the potential burden of stringent regulations, which may lead to increased operational costs and complexities for small recyclers.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the strict penalties outlined for violations of the new regulations. These penalties range from misdemeanors to felonies based on the severity of the offense, which some detractors view as excessively punitive. Critics argue that while the intention to prevent theft is commendable, the execution of these measures could disproportionately affect small recyclers or individuals who may not have the resources to navigate the new requirements effectively.