Michigan House Bill HB5017

Michigan 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 9/18/25
• Refer: 9/18/25

Caption

Crimes: prostitution; references to prostitution; modify in the DNA identification profiling system act. TIE BAR WITH: HB 5016'25

Impact

The proposed legislation is expected to enhance the efficacy of DNA identification as a tool for law enforcement. By mandating the permanent retention of DNA profiles linked to certain offenses, the bill seeks to improve not only the investigation of crimes but also the subsequent prosecution. This retention policy could potentially lead to more successful convictions in serial offenses, particularly in cases commonly associated with the sex industry. However, the amendment emphasizes that DNA samples and profiles must only be disclosed under specific conditions, such as for law enforcement or judicial proceedings, thereby seeking to protect individuals' privacy while still enabling necessary access for crime prevention.

Summary

House Bill 5017 amends the DNA Identification Profiling System Act to include specific provisions about the retention and disposal of DNA samples taken from individuals connected to certain criminal offenses, particularly those involving prostitution. The bill establishes clear guidelines for retaining DNA profiles when an individual is arrested or convicted of a felony or specific misdemeanors. This includes offenses like window peeping, indecent exposure, and various prostitution-related crimes. By defining these criteria, the legislation aims to provide law enforcement with better tools to manage, retain, and process DNA evidence in criminal cases.

Contention

Despite its intended purpose, the bill may face challenges related to privacy and civil rights concerns. Critics could argue that retaining DNA samples even without conviction creates a presumption of guilt that contradicts due process principles. There are also concerns about the potential misuse of retained DNA profiles by law enforcement, especially concerning data privacy and the safeguarding of individual rights. The balance between effective law enforcement strategies and protecting citizens’ civil liberties will likely be a focal point of debate as the bill progresses through the legislative process.