Texas 2015 - 84th Regular

Texas Senate Bill SB33

Filed
11/10/14  
Out of Senate Committee
 
Voted on by House
 
Governor Action
 
Bill Becomes Law
 

Caption

Relating to the offense of hazing.

Impact

The impact of SB33 is significant as it establishes new protocols for reporting and prosecuting hazing incidents. It allows for immunity from prosecution or civil liability for individuals who voluntarily report hazing incidents, provided they cooperate with investigations. This provision aims to encourage reporting by alleviating fears of legal repercussions, ultimately promoting a safer environment within educational institutions. Additionally, the bill mandates educational institutions to distribute a summary of the hazing laws and information about organizations that have faced disciplinary actions for hazing to students each semester.

Summary

SB33 amends the Education Code to define and expand the offense of hazing within educational institutions in Texas. The bill defines hazing as any intentional, knowing, or reckless act that endangers a student's mental or physical health for the purpose of pledging or maintaining membership in an organization. Specifically, it includes acts of physical abuse, sleep deprivation, coercion, and intimidation, clearly outlining the behaviors that constitute hazing and emphasizing the responsibility of educational institutions in preventing such activities.

Sentiment

Sentiment around SB33 appears supportive among those concerned with student safety and well-being, as it provides clearer definitions and consequences for hazing. Advocates argue that the bill is a proactive measure to protect students from dangerous initiation practices commonly associated with fraternities and other organizations. However, some concerns were raised regarding whether the immunity provision could be misused to shield those who perpetrate hazing, potentially complicating accountability.

Contention

Notable points of contention include discussions surrounding the balance between protecting students and safeguarding against the potential misuse of immunity provisions. Some legislators and advocates worry that while encouraging reporting is essential, it should not come at the cost of enabling hazing behaviors to continue. The effectiveness of this bill in curtailing hazing practices will depend on the commitment of educational institutions to enforce these new regulations and foster a culture of safety and accountability among students.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

LA HB96

(Constitutional Amendment) Provides relative to state civil service, including providing that employees hired on or after January 1, 2020, shall be in the unclassified service

LA HB268

Provides relative to the time periods within which to institute prosecution for sex offenses

CA AB679

Criminal trials: testimony of in-custody informants.

LA HB215

Provides for time limitations for prosecution of bank fraud

LA HB61

Extends the time period within which to institute prosecution for certain sex offenses by fifteen years in certain cases

TX SB50

Relating to the offense of hazing.

LA SB182

Constitutional amendment to authorize the attorney general to institute, prosecute, or intervene in any criminal action or proceeding concerning a felony election offense. (2/3 - CA13s1(A)) (OR SEE FISC NOTE GF EX)

LA SB263

Constitutional amendment to remove the requirement that the court of original jurisdiction to authorize the attorney general to institute prosecution and provides that authority to the legislature. (2/3 - CA13s1(A))