Texas House Bill HB1617

Texas 2015 - 84th Regular

Caption

Relating to authorizing certain real property transactions involving the Department of Public Safety of the State of Texas.

Impact

If enacted, this bill facilitates the transfer of real property, which is an important mechanism for state agencies like the DPS to manage land resources effectively. This legislation may streamline processes that require the acquisition or disposal of state property, particularly in situations where such exchanges might further state goals or community needs. By utilizing fair market appraisals and reserving state interests in minerals, the bill attempts to safeguard state assets while promoting cooperation with local entities such as churches.

Summary

House Bill 1617 addresses the authorization of specific real property transactions pertaining to the Department of Public Safety (DPS) of the State of Texas. The bill allows for the exchange of land between the DPS and the First United Pentecostal Church in Center, Texas. The particulars of the transaction dictate that the conveyance can only occur if the fair market values of the properties involved are equal or favor the property being transferred from the church to the state. An independent appraisal will be used to determine these values to ensure equity in the exchange.

Sentiment

The overall discussion surrounding HB 1617 appears to lack significant controversy, as it focuses on straightforward property transactions. Most stakeholders view the intention behind the bill as positive, facilitating productive partnerships between state agencies and local organizations. However, the inevitable outlining of specific terms such as fair market value appraisal ensures that there are checks in place to prevent potential mismanagement or undervaluation of property being conveyed.

Contention

While HB 1617 seems largely supported, potential contention could arise in the execution phase, specifically around the assessments of fair market value. Disagreements over appraisals or the specifics of property descriptions could pose challenges for both parties in the transaction. Additionally, local government entities not involved in the exchanges may raise concerns regarding the implications of such deals on community resources and land availability.