Relating to a requirement that school district superintendents report information relating to the use of restraints against students and student arrests; creating a criminal offense.
Impact
If passed, HB 3341 would significantly alter current regulations regarding how school districts handle student discipline. It establishes specific procedures that mandate timely communication with parents, as well as the need for schools to compile and submit annual reports summarizing these incidents. The legislation emphasizes the importance of monitoring, transparency, and accountability in the use of force against students, thus aiming to enhance protections against potential abuses of power within educational institutions. This requirement for documentation may assist in identifying patterns of behavior or systemic issues within district practices.
Summary
House Bill 3341 introduces a legal requirement for school district superintendents to report information regarding the use of restraints and the arrests of students within school settings. The bill aims to address increasing concerns surrounding student safety and the transparency of disciplinary actions taken against students. Under the proposed legislation, superintendents must notify parents or guardians whenever a student is subjected to physical restraint or arrest and provide detailed information about each incident, such as the nature of the incident, types of restraint used, and specifics about the individual administering the restraint.
Sentiment
The overall sentiment surrounding HB 3341 seems to reflect a balance of support for increased transparency in student disciplinary measures and concerns about the implications for school authorities. Advocates of the bill, including some educators and student rights advocates, emphasize the need for more oversight to protect students' rights and ensure fair treatment. However, there may also be concerns among school districts about the administrative burden these reporting requirements could create and the potential for misuse of this data in public discourse regarding school safety and discipline.
Contention
Some points of contention may arise regarding the reporting requirements stipulated in HB 3341, particularly around the privacy of students involved in these incidents. While the bill maintains that reports should not include personally identifiable information, critics may argue about the broad implications of categorizing student incidents and how this information could be perceived or misused. Additionally, discussions could emerge regarding the adequacy of training for staff on handling restraints and arrests, with suggestions calling for legislative provisions for increased support and resources for schools to implement these changes effectively.
Relating to requiring a school district or open-enrollment charter school to report data regarding certain disciplinary or law enforcement actions taken against students.
Relating to requiring public schools and public institutions of higher education to report data regarding certain arrests made on school or institution property.
Relating to requirements regarding certain behavior management for a student enrolled in a special education program of a public school and related reporting requirements regarding the use of restraint.
Relating to prohibiting the physical restraint of or use of chemical irritants or Tasers on certain public school students by peace officers and school security personnel under certain circumstances.
Relating to information reported through the Public Education Information Management System and to parents regarding disciplinary measures or restraint used by a public school.
Relating to accelerated and supplemental instruction provided to public school students who fail to achieve satisfactory performance on certain assessment instruments and access to criminal history record information for certain tutors providing that instruction.
Relating to the establishment of a terrorist offender registry and to the supervision of those terrorist offenders; creating criminal offenses related to terrorism.