Maryland 2022 Regular Session

Maryland House Bill HB23

Introduced
1/12/22  
Refer
1/12/22  
Report Pass
3/18/22  
Engrossed
3/21/22  

Caption

School Discipline - Data Collection

Impact

The impact of HB 23 on state laws is significant, as it directly affects how disciplinary practices are recorded and reported across public schools. The bill prohibits school resource officers from independently enforcing discipline-related policies, which implies a shift towards reducing reliance on punitive measures in favor of restorative approaches. Additionally, the bill introduces requirements to report disproportionality in discipline actions, particularly for high-suspending schools. These provisions are designed to address existing disparities in school discipline that disproportionately affect marginalized student populations.

Summary

House Bill 23 is a legislative initiative aimed at reforming school discipline policies across Maryland. This bill mandates the State Department of Education to develop and maintain an accessible electronic spreadsheet that disaggregates discipline-related data by various demographic factors, such as race, ethnicity, and disability status. One of the key objectives of HB 23 is to enhance transparency in school discipline practices and ensure that data reflecting disciplinary actions are publicly available, thus allowing for increased accountability within local school systems.

Sentiment

The sentiment regarding HB 23 has been generally supportive among advocates for educational equity and reform. Proponents argue that the bill is a vital step towards promoting fair and equitable treatment of students in disciplinary matters, ensuring that all students have access to safe and supportive educational environments. However, concerns have been raised about the implications of limiting the authority of school resource officers. Some stakeholders fear that this may hinder schools' ability to maintain safety and order, particularly in high-conflict environments.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding HB 23 include apprehensions from law enforcement and certain educational administrators about the limitations placed on school resource officers. While the bill seeks to dismantle punitive discipline practices, opponents argue that effective discipline is necessary for school safety. The ongoing debate highlights a tension between the desires to create restorative, equitable school environments and the need for maintaining discipline and security in schools. These concerns illustrate the broader conversation regarding the role of law enforcement in educational settings and the effectiveness of alternative disciplinary practices.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB1007

Local government financing: juvenile justice.

NJ SR59

Urges federal government to preserve school discipline guidance package issued in 2014.

NJ S4037

Directs DOE to develop guidelines consistent with federal guidance concerning school discipline in school districts.

NJ A3938

Establishes task force to examine school discipline practices including racial disparities and effectiveness.

NJ S1657

Establishes task force to examine school discipline practices including racial disparities and effectiveness.

NJ A1513

Establishes task force to examine school discipline practices including racial disparities and effectiveness.

NJ S2945

Establishes task force to examine school discipline practices including racial disparities and effectiveness.

CA SB646

State Civil Service Act: adverse action: notice.