Maryland 2023 Regular Session

Maryland House Bill HB571

Introduced
2/3/23  
Refer
2/3/23  
Report Pass
3/13/23  
Engrossed
3/15/23  
Refer
3/16/23  
Report Pass
4/5/23  
Enrolled
4/8/23  
Chaptered
5/3/23  

Caption

Opioids - Opioid Restitution Advisory Council and Fund and Overdose Response Program

Impact

The bill provides clear stipulations on the functioning and funding of the Opioid Restitution Fund, which is designed to receive settlement funds related to opioid litigation. It mandates that such funds be appropriated and distributed according to specified agreements, thus ensuring accountability and intended use. This legislative move is positioned to bolster public health initiatives aimed at combating the opioid crisis by making reversal drugs more accessible and tailoring them to community requirements.

Summary

House Bill 571 establishes an Opioid Restitution Advisory Council and enhances the state's Overdose Response Program. The bill aims to improve the management of opioid overdose situations by allowing designated entities, under the Maryland Department of Health, to choose the formulation or dosage of opioid overdose reversal drugs they administer. This flexibility is intended to ensure that entities can effectively respond to opioid overdoses based on specific community needs and circumstances.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 571 appears to be generally positive, reflecting a recognition of the ongoing challenges posed by the opioid epidemic. Stakeholders have expressed support for measures that enhance community-based interventions and provide necessary resources. However, some concerns may be raised regarding the effective allocation and management of the funds, as well as ensuring that the guidelines established by the advisory council are enacted efficiently to achieve desired public health outcomes.

Contention

While there seems to be consensus on the necessity of addressing the opioid crisis, the mechanisms for implementing these solutions may spark debate. Some legislators and public health advocates might question the effectiveness of allowing flexibility in drug formulations as it relates to the standardization of treatment protocols. There may also be discussions around ensuring robust oversight of the Opioid Restitution Fund to prevent misallocation or inefficiencies in spending intended for vital public health initiatives.

Companion Bills

MD SB954

Crossfiled Opioids - Opioid Restitution Advisory Council and Fund and Overdose Response Program

Previously Filed As

MD SB954

Opioids - Opioid Restitution Advisory Council and Fund and Overdose Response Program

MD SB594

Public Health - Use of Opioid Restitution Fund and Training Under the Overdose Response Program

MD HB794

Public Health – Opioid Restitution Fund Advisory Council

MD SB751

Public Health – Opioid Restitution Advisory Council and Fund – Revisions

MD HB980

Public Health - Opioid Restitution Advisory Council and Fund - Revisions

MD HB729

Public Health - Use of Opioid Restitution Fund and Training Under the Overdose Response Program

MD HB1155

Hospitals - Opioid Overdose and Opioid-Related Emergency Medical Conditions - Treatment

MD SB1071

Hospitals - Opioid Overdose and Opioid-Related Emergency Medical Conditions - Treatment

MD HB728

Opioid Restitution Fund - Authorized Uses

MD SB495

Opioid Restitution Fund - Authorized Uses

Similar Bills

NC S655

Update Structured Settlement Protection Act

NC H845

Update Structured Settlement Protection Act

IL HB5278

GOV EMPLOYEE TORT IMMUNITY

CA AB3109

Contracts: waiver of right of petition or free speech.

AZ HB2275

Settlement agreements; report; approval

CA SB820

Settlement agreements: confidentiality.

CA SB1135

Settlement agreements: confidentiality.

MD SB954

Opioids - Opioid Restitution Advisory Council and Fund and Overdose Response Program