Maryland 2023 Regular Session

Maryland Senate Bill SB132

Introduced
1/12/23  

Caption

State's Attorney, Clerk of the Circuit Court, Register of Wills, Sheriff, and Judge of the Orphans' Court - Nonpartisan Elections

Impact

If enacted, SB 132 would significantly alter the current election landscape for the specified offices by eliminating party affiliation requirements for candidates. This change is intended to foster a more open electoral environment where voters can make choices based on candidate qualifications rather than party loyalty. Moreover, it opens primary elections to all registered voters, enhancing democratic participation and potentially leading to more representative outcomes in local governance. The effects of this change may also ripple out, influencing future electoral reforms and encouraging similar discussions in other jurisdictions.

Summary

Senate Bill 132 proposes the establishment of nonpartisan elections for key local government positions including the State’s Attorney, Clerk of the Circuit Court, Register of Wills, Sheriff, and Judge of the Orphans’ Court in Maryland. The bill aims to amend existing election law statutes to facilitate elections for these positions without party affiliation, thereby allowing all registered voters to participate in nominating candidates regardless of their political affiliations. This amendment reflects a broader trend towards reducing partisan influence in local elections and promoting inclusivity in the electoral process.

Contention

One notable point of contention surrounding SB 132 is the debate on whether nonpartisan elections can effectively diminish partisan biases in local governance. Proponents argue that the bill will encourage a diverse range of candidates and perspectives, reducing the dominance of political parties in local elections. Conversely, critics express concerns that the absence of partisan labels may leave voters without clear indicators of candidates' policy positions and values. There are fears that this could result in confusion or disillusionment among voters who rely on party affiliation as a guide for their electoral choices.

Last_action

The bill was introduced and read for the first time on January 12, 2023, and it is currently assigned to the Education, Energy, and the Environment and Judicial Proceedings committees, reflecting its multifaceted implications for both legal and electoral systems.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

MD HB44

Election Law - Circuit Court Judges - Nonpartisan Elections

MD HB306

Election Law - Circuit Court Judges - Nonpartisan General Elections

MD SB257

Providing for nonpartisan election of county sheriffs, prosecutors, assessors, county clerks, and circuit clerks

MD SB23

Orphans’ Court Judges – Elections

MD HB677

Orphans' Court Judges - Elections

MD SB485

Orphans' Court Judges - Election and Restriction on Practicing Law

MD HB879

Orphans’ Court Judges – Election and Restriction on Practicing Law

MD SB195

Orphans’ Court Judges – Election

MD HB1282

Orphans’ Court Judges – Election

MD SB2632

Sheriff elections; make nonpartisan.

Similar Bills

IL SB3671

STATES ATTY-PEACE OFCR-PRIVACY

IL SB2087

STATES ATTY-PEACE OFCR-PRIVACY

CA SB605

State attorneys and administrative law judges: compensation.

CA AB1163

Minors: power of attorney to care for a minor child.

CA SB1109

Adoption.

CA SB710

District attorneys: conflicts of interest.

CA AB2083

Public utilities: rates.

CA AB894

Attorney General: directors and employees: exemption from civil service.