Old | New | Differences | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | - | WES MOORE, Governor Ch. 646 | |
2 | 1 | ||
3 | - | – 1 – | |
4 | - | Chapter 646 | |
5 | - | (House Bill 1199) | |
6 | 2 | ||
7 | - | AN ACT concerning | |
3 | + | EXPLANATION: CAPITALS INDICATE MAT TER ADDED TO EXISTIN G LAW. | |
4 | + | [Brackets] indicate matter deleted from existing law. | |
5 | + | Underlining indicates amendments to bill. | |
6 | + | Strike out indicates matter stricken from the bill by amendment or deleted from the law by | |
7 | + | amendment. | |
8 | + | Italics indicate opposite chamber/conference committee amendments. | |
9 | + | *hb1199* | |
8 | 10 | ||
9 | - | Transportation – MobilityLink Paratransit Service Improvements – Study | |
11 | + | HOUSE BILL 1199 | |
12 | + | R2 (4lr2185) | |
13 | + | ENROLLED BILL | |
14 | + | — Environment and Transportation/Finance — | |
15 | + | Introduced by Delegate Edelson Delegates Edelson, Allen, Addison, Boyce, Guyton, | |
16 | + | Healey, Lehman, T. Morgan, Ruth, and Terrasa | |
10 | 17 | ||
11 | - | FOR the purpose of requiring the Maryland Transportation Institute at the University of | |
12 | - | Maryland to conduct a study to identify methods to improve the Maryland Transit | |
13 | - | Administration’s ADA MobilityLink paratransit service; requiring the Maryland | |
14 | - | Department of Transportation to incorporate the findings and recommendations of | |
15 | - | the study conducted under this Act into a certain transportation plan; and generally | |
16 | - | relating to the study to identify methods to improve the Administration’s ADA | |
17 | - | MobilityLink paratransit service. | |
18 | + | Read and Examined by Proofreaders: | |
18 | 19 | ||
19 | - | SECTION 1. BE IT ENACTED BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF MARYLAND, | |
20 | - | That: | |
20 | + | _______________________________________________ | |
21 | + | Proofreader. | |
22 | + | _______________________________________________ | |
23 | + | Proofreader. | |
21 | 24 | ||
22 | - | ||
25 | + | Sealed with the Great Seal and presented to the Governor, for his approval this | |
23 | 26 | ||
24 | - | ||
27 | + | _______ day of _______________ at ________________________ o’clock, ________M. | |
25 | 28 | ||
26 | - | (3) “Administration” means the Maryland Transit Administration. | |
29 | + | ______________________________________________ | |
30 | + | Speaker. | |
27 | 31 | ||
28 | - | (b) The Maryland Transportation Institute at the University of Maryland shall | |
29 | - | conduct a study to identify methods to improve the Maryland Transit Administration’s | |
30 | - | ADA MobilityLink paratransit service. | |
32 | + | CHAPTER ______ | |
31 | 33 | ||
32 | - | ||
34 | + | AN ACT concerning 1 | |
33 | 35 | ||
34 | - | (1) summarize and compare the Administration’s MobilityLink service to | |
35 | - | similar entities nationwide that provide ADA paratransit services; | |
36 | + | Transportation – MobilityLink Paratransit Service Improvements – Study 2 | |
36 | 37 | ||
37 | - | (2) identify the service structure of ADA paratransit services in other | |
38 | - | service areas nationwide and whether a public entity, private contractor, or hybrid model | |
39 | - | is used to provide the service, including consideration of how the following services are | |
40 | - | provided: | |
38 | + | FOR the purpose of requiring the Maryland Transportation Institute at the University of 3 | |
39 | + | Maryland to conduct a study to identify methods to improve the Maryland Transit 4 | |
40 | + | Administration’s ADA MobilityLink paratransit service; requiring the Maryland 5 | |
41 | + | Department of Transportation to incorporate the findings and recommendations of 6 | |
42 | + | the study conducted under this Act into a certain transportation plan; and generally 7 | |
43 | + | relating to the study to identify methods to improve the Administration’s ADA 8 | |
44 | + | MobilityLink paratransit service. 9 | |
41 | 45 | ||
42 | - | (i) fleet ownership; | |
46 | + | SECTION 1. BE IT ENACTED BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF MARYLAND, 10 | |
47 | + | That: 11 | |
43 | 48 | ||
44 | - | ( | |
49 | + | (a) (1) In this section the following words have the meanings indicated. 12 2 HOUSE BILL 1199 | |
45 | 50 | ||
46 | - | (iii) dispatch; | |
47 | 51 | ||
48 | - | (iv) reservations; | |
49 | - | Ch. 646 2024 LAWS OF MARYLAND | |
50 | 52 | ||
51 | - | – 2 – | |
52 | - | (v) scheduling; | |
53 | + | (2) “ADA” means the federal Americans with Disabilities Act. 1 | |
53 | 54 | ||
54 | - | ( | |
55 | + | (3) “Administration” means the Maryland Transit Administration. 2 | |
55 | 56 | ||
56 | - | (vii) mechanics; | |
57 | + | (b) The Maryland Transportation Institute at the University of Maryland shall 3 | |
58 | + | conduct a study to identify methods to improve the Maryland Transit Administration’s 4 | |
59 | + | ADA MobilityLink paratransit service. 5 | |
57 | 60 | ||
58 | - | ( | |
61 | + | (c) The study shall: 6 | |
59 | 62 | ||
60 | - | (ix) quality assurance and control; and | |
63 | + | (1) summarize and compare the Administration’s MobilityLink service to 7 | |
64 | + | similar entities nationwide that provide ADA paratransit services; 8 | |
61 | 65 | ||
62 | - | (x) any other relevant aspects as the Maryland Transportation | |
63 | - | Institute deems necessary; | |
66 | + | (2) identify the service structure of ADA paratransit services in other 9 | |
67 | + | service areas nationwide and whether a public entity, private contractor, or hybrid model 10 | |
68 | + | is used to provide the service, including consideration of how the following services are 11 | |
69 | + | provided: 12 | |
64 | 70 | ||
65 | - | (3) analyze both the short– and long–term fiscal costs and savings | |
66 | - | associated with each type of ADA paratransit service model, including a comparison of the | |
67 | - | quality of service and reliability of each service model; | |
71 | + | (i) fleet ownership; 13 | |
68 | 72 | ||
69 | - | (4) analyze the performance metrics associated with the ADA paratransit | |
70 | - | services in various service areas nationwide based on the Federal Transit Administration’s | |
71 | - | ADA Guidance for metrics, including: | |
73 | + | (ii) fleet maintenance; 14 | |
72 | 74 | ||
73 | - | ( | |
75 | + | (iii) dispatch; 15 | |
74 | 76 | ||
75 | - | ( | |
77 | + | (iv) reservations; 16 | |
76 | 78 | ||
77 | - | ( | |
79 | + | (v) scheduling; 17 | |
78 | 80 | ||
79 | - | ( | |
81 | + | (vi) operators; 18 | |
80 | 82 | ||
81 | - | ( | |
83 | + | (vii) mechanics; 19 | |
82 | 84 | ||
83 | - | ( | |
85 | + | (viii) customer service; 20 | |
84 | 86 | ||
85 | - | ( | |
87 | + | (ix) quality assurance and control; and 21 | |
86 | 88 | ||
87 | - | ( | |
88 | - | ||
89 | + | (x) any other relevant aspects as the Maryland Transportation 22 | |
90 | + | Institute deems necessary; 23 | |
89 | 91 | ||
90 | - | (i) turnover rate; | |
92 | + | (3) analyze both the short– and long–term fiscal costs and savings 24 | |
93 | + | associated with each type of ADA paratransit service model, including a comparison of the 25 | |
94 | + | quality of service and reliability of each service model; 26 | |
91 | 95 | ||
92 | - | (ii) average length of employment; | |
96 | + | (4) analyze the performance metrics associated with the ADA paratransit 27 | |
97 | + | services in various service areas nationwide based on the Federal Transit Administration’s 28 | |
98 | + | ADA Guidance for metrics, including: 29 HOUSE BILL 1199 3 | |
93 | 99 | ||
94 | - | (iii) absenteeism rate; | |
95 | 100 | ||
96 | - | (iv) accidents and preventable accident rates; | |
97 | - | WES MOORE, Governor Ch. 646 | |
98 | 101 | ||
99 | - | – 3 – | |
100 | - | (v) workplace injury rates; | |
102 | + | (i) on–time performance for pick–ups and drop–offs; 1 | |
101 | 103 | ||
102 | - | ( | |
104 | + | (ii) missed trips; 2 | |
103 | 105 | ||
104 | - | ( | |
106 | + | (iii) onboard transit times; 3 | |
105 | 107 | ||
106 | - | ( | |
108 | + | (iv) excessive trip lengths; 4 | |
107 | 109 | ||
108 | - | ( | |
110 | + | (v) call center hold times and performance; 5 | |
109 | 111 | ||
110 | - | ( | |
112 | + | (vi) rate of customer complaints and resolution; and 6 | |
111 | 113 | ||
112 | - | (xi) any other relevant aspects as the Maryland Transportation | |
113 | - | Institute deems necessary; | |
114 | + | (vii) safety conditions and practices on paratransit vehicles; 7 | |
114 | 115 | ||
115 | - | (6) in consultation with the Maryland Commission on Disabilities and the | |
116 | - | State Coordinating Committee for Human Services Transportation, solicit input and | |
117 | - | comments from the public and riders of the Administration’s MobilityLink paratransit | |
118 | - | service; and | |
116 | + | (5) analyze the workforce metrics among the ADA paratransit services in 8 | |
117 | + | various service areas nationwide, including: 9 | |
119 | 118 | ||
120 | - | (7) develop recommendations for service improvements to the | |
121 | - | Administration’s MobilityLink paratransit service, considering long–term costs and | |
122 | - | benefits alongside a qualitative analysis to enhance the delivery of high–quality service to | |
123 | - | MobilityLink riders; | |
119 | + | (i) turnover rate; 10 | |
124 | 120 | ||
125 | - | (8) develop recommendations for service improvements to individuals in | |
126 | - | areas outside of three–quarters of a mile of a fixed transportation route; and | |
121 | + | (ii) average length of employment; 11 | |
127 | 122 | ||
128 | - | (9) develop recommendations to address interjurisdictional restrictions to | |
129 | - | paratransit services, including restrictions relating to medical appointments that cross | |
130 | - | jurisdictional lines. | |
123 | + | (iii) absenteeism rate; 12 | |
131 | 124 | ||
132 | - | (d) The Governor may include in the fiscal year 2026 budget bill an appropriation | |
133 | - | of at least $150,000 for the purpose of carrying out the study required under subsection (b) | |
134 | - | of this section. | |
125 | + | (iv) accidents and preventable accident rates; 13 | |
135 | 126 | ||
136 | - | (e) On or before July 1, 2025, the Maryland Transportation Institute shall submit | |
137 | - | a report on its findings and recommendations to: | |
127 | + | (v) workplace injury rates; 14 | |
138 | 128 | ||
139 | - | ( | |
129 | + | (vi) workers’ compensation claims rates; 15 | |
140 | 130 | ||
141 | - | ( | |
131 | + | (vii) career training opportunities; 16 | |
142 | 132 | ||
143 | - | (i) the General Assembly; | |
144 | - | Ch. 646 2024 LAWS OF MARYLAND | |
133 | + | (viii) career advancement opportunities; 17 | |
145 | 134 | ||
146 | - | – 4 – | |
147 | - | (ii) the members of the Anne Arundel County Delegation to the | |
148 | - | Maryland General Assembly; | |
135 | + | (ix) average wages and benefits; 18 | |
149 | 136 | ||
150 | - | (iii) the members of the Baltimore County Delegation to the | |
151 | - | Maryland General Assembly; and | |
137 | + | (x) morale and satisfaction; and 19 | |
152 | 138 | ||
153 | - | ( | |
154 | - | ||
139 | + | (xi) any other relevant aspects as the Maryland Transportation 20 | |
140 | + | Institute deems necessary; 21 | |
155 | 141 | ||
156 | - | (3) the County Executive and County Council of Anne Arundel County; | |
142 | + | (6) in consultation with the Maryland Commission on Disabilities and the 22 | |
143 | + | State Coordinating Committee for Human Services Transportation, solicit input and 23 | |
144 | + | comments from the public and riders of the Administration’s MobilityLink paratransit 24 | |
145 | + | service; and 25 | |
146 | + | 4 HOUSE BILL 1199 | |
157 | 147 | ||
158 | - | (4) the County Executive and County Council of Baltimore County; and | |
159 | 148 | ||
160 | - | (5) the Maryland Department of Transportation; and | |
149 | + | (7) develop recommendations for service improvements to the 1 | |
150 | + | Administration’s MobilityLink paratransit service, considering long–term costs and 2 | |
151 | + | benefits alongside a qualitative analysis to enhance the delivery of high–quality service to 3 | |
152 | + | MobilityLink riders; 4 | |
161 | 153 | ||
162 | - | (5) (6) the Mayor and City Council of Baltimore City. | |
154 | + | (8) develop recommendations for service improvements to individuals in 5 | |
155 | + | areas outside of three–quarters of a mile of a fixed transportation route; and 6 | |
163 | 156 | ||
164 | - | | |
165 | - | ||
166 | - | ||
157 | + | (9) develop recommendations to address interjurisdictional restrictions to 7 | |
158 | + | paratransit services, including restrictions relating to medical appointments that cross 8 | |
159 | + | jurisdictional lines. 9 | |
167 | 160 | ||
168 | - | SECTION 2. 3. 2. AND BE IT FURTHER ENACTED, That this Act shall take effect | |
169 | - | July 1, 2024. It shall remain effective for a period of 1 year and 6 months 2 years and, at | |
170 | - | the end of December 31, 2025 June 30, 2026, this Act, with no further action required by | |
171 | - | the General Assembly, shall be abrogated and of no further force and effect. | |
161 | + | (d) The Governor may include in the fiscal year 2026 budget bill an appropriation 10 | |
162 | + | of at least $150,000 for the purpose of carrying out the study required under subsection (b) 11 | |
163 | + | of this section. 12 | |
172 | 164 | ||
173 | - | Approved by the Governor, May 9, 2024. | |
165 | + | (e) On or before July 1, 2025, the Maryland Transportation Institute shall submit 13 | |
166 | + | a report on its findings and recommendations to: 14 | |
167 | + | ||
168 | + | (1) the Governor; 15 | |
169 | + | ||
170 | + | (2) in accordance with § 2–1257 of the State Government Article: 16 | |
171 | + | ||
172 | + | (i) the General Assembly; 17 | |
173 | + | ||
174 | + | (ii) the members of the Anne Arundel County Delegation to the 18 | |
175 | + | Maryland General Assembly; 19 | |
176 | + | ||
177 | + | (iii) the members of the Baltimore County Delegation to the 20 | |
178 | + | Maryland General Assembly; and 21 | |
179 | + | ||
180 | + | (iv) the members of the Baltimore City Delegation to the Maryland 22 | |
181 | + | General Assembly; 23 | |
182 | + | ||
183 | + | (3) the County Executive and County Council of Anne Arundel County; 24 | |
184 | + | ||
185 | + | (4) the County Executive and County Council of Baltimore County; and 25 | |
186 | + | ||
187 | + | (5) the Maryland Department of Transportation; and 26 | |
188 | + | ||
189 | + | (5) (6) the Mayor and City Council of Baltimore City. 27 | |
190 | + | ||
191 | + | SECTION 2. AND BE IT FURTHER ENACTED, That the Maryland Department of 28 | |
192 | + | Transportation shall incorporate the findings and recommendations of the study conducted 29 | |
193 | + | under Section 1 of this Act into the 2050 Maryland Transportation Plan. 30 | |
194 | + | HOUSE BILL 1199 5 | |
195 | + | ||
196 | + | ||
197 | + | SECTION 2. 3. 2. AND BE IT FURTHER ENACTED, That this Act shall take effect 1 | |
198 | + | July 1, 2024. It shall remain effective for a period of 1 year and 6 months 2 years and, at 2 | |
199 | + | the end of December 31, 2025 June 30, 2026, this Act, with no further action required by 3 | |
200 | + | the General Assembly, shall be abrogated and of no further force and effect. 4 | |
201 | + | ||
202 | + | ||
203 | + | ||
204 | + | Approved: | |
205 | + | ________________________________________________________________________________ | |
206 | + | Governor. | |
207 | + | ________________________________________________________________________________ | |
208 | + | Speaker of the House of Delegates. | |
209 | + | ________________________________________________________________________________ | |
210 | + | President of the Senate. |