Maryland 2024 Regular Session

Maryland Senate Bill SB672

Introduced
1/29/24  
Refer
1/29/24  
Report Pass
3/4/24  
Engrossed
3/7/24  
Refer
3/8/24  
Report Pass
4/5/24  
Enrolled
4/8/24  
Chaptered
5/9/24  

Caption

Vehicle Laws - Automated Enforcement Citations and Notices - Mailing Addresses

Impact

The bill's impact on state laws focuses on enhancing the reliability and accountability of automated enforcement mechanisms in Maryland. By establishing a clear protocol for mailing violations, it seeks to reduce disputes concerning non-receipt of citations which often arise due to outdated or incorrect owner addresses. This clarity could lead to higher compliance rates and adherence to traffic laws, as owners will be better informed of their violations and associated penalties.

Summary

Senate Bill 672 addresses the requirements for mailing citations and notices resulting from automated traffic enforcement in Maryland. It mandates that notices related to traffic violations be mailed to the registered owner's current mailing address on file with the Maryland Vehicle Administration. If a mailing address is unavailable, the owner's current residential address must be used. This amendment aims to ensure that vehicle owners are notified promptly and accurately regarding traffic citations that may be incurred via automated systems, such as speed cameras or red light cameras.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment around SB672 appears to be supportive, particularly from law enforcement agencies and public safety advocates who believe that accurate citation mailing strengthens traffic enforcement's effectiveness. However, there could also be concerns regarding privacy implications and the administrative burden placed on agencies to ensure the accuracy of address records. These sentiments highlight a tension between public safety measures and the potential for revisions to enforcement practices.

Contention

Notable points of contention in discussions surrounding SB672 include the potential for increased administrative scrutiny and the responsibilities placed on both agencies and vehicle owners. Some stakeholders might contend that solely relying on automated systems for law enforcement could raise issues regarding accuracy and fairness. Additionally, opponents could argue for further reforms in automated systems to ensure due process is maintained, alongside the intended enhancements for notification processes defined in this bill.

Companion Bills

MD HB552

Crossfiled Vehicle Laws - Automated Enforcement Citations and Notices - Mailing Addresses

Similar Bills

MD HB794

Baltimore Regional Transit Commission - Establishment

MD SB156

Port of Baltimore - Renaming

MD HB375

Port of Baltimore - Renaming

MD SB1067

Baltimore County - Speed Monitoring Systems - Interstate 695

MD HB1502

Baltimore County - Speed Monitoring Systems - Interstate 695

MD SB862

Baltimore City - Maryland Transit Administration - Transit Services for Public School Students and Youth Workers

MD SB450

Baltimore County - Speed Monitoring Systems - Residential Districts and Mailing of Citations

MD HB517

Workgroup on the Reorganization of the Maryland Transit Administration