Old | New | Differences | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | - | WES MOORE, Governor Ch. 647 | |
2 | 1 | ||
3 | - | – 1 – | |
4 | - | Chapter 647 | |
5 | - | (Senate Bill 891) | |
6 | 2 | ||
7 | - | AN ACT concerning | |
3 | + | EXPLANATION: CAPITALS INDICATE MAT TER ADDED TO EXISTIN G LAW. | |
4 | + | [Brackets] indicate matter deleted from existing law. | |
5 | + | Underlining indicates amendments to bill. | |
6 | + | Strike out indicates matter stricken from the bill by amendment or deleted from the law by | |
7 | + | amendment. | |
8 | + | Italics indicate opposite chamber/conference committee amendments. | |
9 | + | *sb0891* | |
8 | 10 | ||
9 | - | Transportation – MobilityLink Paratransit Service Improvements – Study | |
11 | + | SENATE BILL 891 | |
12 | + | R2 (4lr2778) | |
13 | + | ENROLLED BILL | |
14 | + | — Finance/Environment and Transportation — | |
15 | + | Introduced by Senator McCray | |
10 | 16 | ||
11 | - | FOR the purpose of requiring the Maryland Transportation Institute at the University of | |
12 | - | Maryland to conduct a study to identify methods to improve the Maryland Transit | |
13 | - | Administration’s ADA MobilityLink paratransit service; and generally relating to | |
14 | - | the study to identify methods to improve the Administration’s ADA MobilityLink | |
15 | - | paratransit service. | |
17 | + | Read and Examined by Proofreaders: | |
16 | 18 | ||
17 | - | SECTION 1. BE IT ENACTED BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF MARYLAND, | |
18 | - | That: | |
19 | + | _______________________________________________ | |
20 | + | Proofreader. | |
21 | + | _______________________________________________ | |
22 | + | Proofreader. | |
19 | 23 | ||
20 | - | ||
24 | + | Sealed with the Great Seal and presented to the Governor, for his approval this | |
21 | 25 | ||
22 | - | ||
26 | + | _______ day of _______________ at _________________ _______ o’clock, ________M. | |
23 | 27 | ||
24 | - | (3) “Administration” means the Maryland Transit Administration. | |
28 | + | ______________________________________________ | |
29 | + | President. | |
25 | 30 | ||
26 | - | (b) The Maryland Transportation Institute at the University of Maryland shall | |
27 | - | conduct a study to identify methods to improve the Maryland Transit Administration’s | |
28 | - | ADA MobilityLink paratransit service. | |
31 | + | CHAPTER ______ | |
29 | 32 | ||
30 | - | ||
33 | + | AN ACT concerning 1 | |
31 | 34 | ||
32 | - | (1) summarize and compare the Administration’s MobilityLink service to | |
33 | - | similar entities nationwide that provide ADA paratransit services; | |
35 | + | Transportation – MobilityLink Paratransit Service Improvements – Study 2 | |
34 | 36 | ||
35 | - | (2) identify the service structure of ADA paratransit services in other | |
36 | - | service areas nationwide and whether a public entity, private contractor, or hybrid model | |
37 | - | is used to provide the service, including consideration of how the following services are | |
38 | - | provided: | |
37 | + | FOR the purpose of requiring the Maryland Transportation Institute at the University of 3 | |
38 | + | Maryland to conduct a study to identify methods to improve the Maryland Transit 4 | |
39 | + | Administration’s ADA MobilityLink paratransit service; and generally relating to 5 | |
40 | + | the study to identify methods to improve the Administration’s ADA MobilityLink 6 | |
41 | + | paratransit service. 7 | |
39 | 42 | ||
40 | - | (i) fleet ownership; | |
43 | + | SECTION 1. BE IT ENACTED BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF MARYLAND, 8 | |
44 | + | That: 9 | |
41 | 45 | ||
42 | - | ( | |
46 | + | (a) (1) In this section the following words have the meanings indicated. 10 | |
43 | 47 | ||
44 | - | (iii) dispatch; | |
48 | + | (2) “ADA” means the federal Americans with Disabilities Act. 11 | |
49 | + | 2 SENATE BILL 891 | |
45 | 50 | ||
46 | - | (iv) reservations; | |
47 | 51 | ||
48 | - | (v) scheduling; | |
49 | - | Ch. 647 2024 LAWS OF MARYLAND | |
52 | + | (3) “Administration” means the Maryland Transit Administration. 1 | |
50 | 53 | ||
51 | - | – 2 – | |
52 | - | (vi) operators; | |
54 | + | (b) The Maryland Transportation Institute at the University of Maryland shall 2 | |
55 | + | conduct a study to identify methods to improve the Maryland Transit Administration’s 3 | |
56 | + | ADA MobilityLink paratransit service. 4 | |
53 | 57 | ||
54 | - | ( | |
58 | + | (c) The study shall: 5 | |
55 | 59 | ||
56 | - | (viii) customer service; | |
60 | + | (1) summarize and compare the Administration’s MobilityLink service to 6 | |
61 | + | similar entities nationwide that provide ADA paratransit services; 7 | |
57 | 62 | ||
58 | - | (ix) quality assurance and control; and | |
63 | + | (2) identify the service structure of ADA paratransit services in other 8 | |
64 | + | service areas nationwide and whether a public entity, private contractor, or hybrid model 9 | |
65 | + | is used to provide the service, including consideration of how the following services are 10 | |
66 | + | provided: 11 | |
59 | 67 | ||
60 | - | (x) any other relevant aspects as the Maryland Transportation | |
61 | - | Institute deems necessary; | |
68 | + | (i) fleet ownership; 12 | |
62 | 69 | ||
63 | - | (3) analyze both the short– and long–term fiscal costs and savings | |
64 | - | associated with each type of ADA paratransit service model, including a comparison of the | |
65 | - | quality of service and reliability of each service model; | |
70 | + | (ii) fleet maintenance; 13 | |
66 | 71 | ||
67 | - | (4) analyze the performance metrics associated with the ADA paratransit | |
68 | - | services in various service areas nationwide based on the Federal Transit Administration’s | |
69 | - | ADA Guidance for metrics, including: | |
72 | + | (iii) dispatch; 14 | |
70 | 73 | ||
71 | - | ( | |
74 | + | (iv) reservations; 15 | |
72 | 75 | ||
73 | - | ( | |
76 | + | (v) scheduling; 16 | |
74 | 77 | ||
75 | - | ( | |
78 | + | (vi) operators; 17 | |
76 | 79 | ||
77 | - | ( | |
80 | + | (vii) mechanics; 18 | |
78 | 81 | ||
79 | - | ( | |
82 | + | (viii) customer service; 19 | |
80 | 83 | ||
81 | - | ( | |
84 | + | (ix) quality assurance and control; and 20 | |
82 | 85 | ||
83 | - | (vii) safety conditions and practices on paratransit vehicles; | |
86 | + | (x) any other relevant aspects as the Maryland Transportation 21 | |
87 | + | Institute deems necessary; 22 | |
84 | 88 | ||
85 | - | (5) analyze the workforce metrics among the ADA paratransit services in | |
86 | - | various service areas nationwide, including: | |
89 | + | (3) analyze both the short– and long–term fiscal costs and savings 23 | |
90 | + | associated with each type of ADA paratransit service model, including a comparison of the 24 | |
91 | + | quality of service and reliability of each service model; 25 | |
87 | 92 | ||
88 | - | (i) turnover rate; | |
93 | + | (4) analyze the performance metrics associated with the ADA paratransit 26 | |
94 | + | services in various service areas nationwide based on the Federal Transit Administration’s 27 | |
95 | + | ADA Guidance for metrics, including: 28 | |
89 | 96 | ||
90 | - | (ii) average length of employment; | |
97 | + | (i) on–time performance for pick–ups and drop–offs; 29 | |
98 | + | SENATE BILL 891 3 | |
91 | 99 | ||
92 | - | (iii) absenteeism rate; | |
93 | 100 | ||
94 | - | ( | |
101 | + | (ii) missed trips; 1 | |
95 | 102 | ||
96 | - | (v) workplace injury rates; | |
97 | - | WES MOORE, Governor Ch. 647 | |
103 | + | (iii) onboard transit times; 2 | |
98 | 104 | ||
99 | - | – 3 – | |
100 | - | (vi) workers’ compensation claims rates; | |
105 | + | (iv) excessive trip lengths; 3 | |
101 | 106 | ||
102 | - | ( | |
107 | + | (v) call center hold times and performance; 4 | |
103 | 108 | ||
104 | - | ( | |
109 | + | (vi) rate of customer complaints and resolution; and 5 | |
105 | 110 | ||
106 | - | ( | |
111 | + | (vii) safety conditions and practices on paratransit vehicles; 6 | |
107 | 112 | ||
108 | - | (x) morale and satisfaction; and | |
113 | + | (5) analyze the workforce metrics among the ADA paratransit services in 7 | |
114 | + | various service areas nationwide, including: 8 | |
109 | 115 | ||
110 | - | (xi) any other relevant aspects as the Maryland Transportation | |
111 | - | Institute deems necessary; | |
116 | + | (i) turnover rate; 9 | |
112 | 117 | ||
113 | - | (6) in consultation with the Maryland Commission on Disabilities and the | |
114 | - | State Coordinating Committee for Human Services Transportation, solicit input and | |
115 | - | comments from the public and riders of the Administration’s MobilityLink paratransit | |
116 | - | service; and | |
118 | + | (ii) average length of employment; 10 | |
117 | 119 | ||
118 | - | (7) develop recommendations for service improvements to the | |
119 | - | Administration’s MobilityLink paratransit service, considering long–term costs and | |
120 | - | benefits alongside a qualitative analysis to enhance the delivery of high–quality service to | |
121 | - | MobilityLink riders; | |
120 | + | (iii) absenteeism rate; 11 | |
122 | 121 | ||
123 | - | (8) develop recommendations for service improvements to individuals | |
124 | - | located at least three–quarters of a mile from in areas outside of three–quarters of a mile of | |
125 | - | a fixed transportation route; and | |
122 | + | (iv) accidents and preventable accident rates; 12 | |
126 | 123 | ||
127 | - | (9) develop recommendations to address interjurisdictional restrictions to | |
128 | - | paratransit services, including restrictions relating to medical appointments that cross | |
129 | - | jurisdictional lines. | |
124 | + | (v) workplace injury rates; 13 | |
130 | 125 | ||
131 | - | (d) The Governor may include in the fiscal year 2026 budget bill an appropriation | |
132 | - | of at least $150,000 for the purpose of carrying out the study required under subsection (b) | |
133 | - | of this section. | |
126 | + | (vi) workers’ compensation claims rates; 14 | |
134 | 127 | ||
135 | - | (e) On or before July 1, 2025, the Maryland Transportation Institute shall submit | |
136 | - | a report on its findings and recommendations to: | |
128 | + | (vii) career training opportunities; 15 | |
137 | 129 | ||
138 | - | ( | |
130 | + | (viii) career advancement opportunities; 16 | |
139 | 131 | ||
140 | - | ( | |
132 | + | (ix) average wages and benefits; 17 | |
141 | 133 | ||
142 | - | ( | |
134 | + | (x) morale and satisfaction; and 18 | |
143 | 135 | ||
144 | - | ( | |
145 | - | ||
136 | + | (xi) any other relevant aspects as the Maryland Transportation 19 | |
137 | + | Institute deems necessary; 20 | |
146 | 138 | ||
147 | - | – 4 – | |
139 | + | (6) in consultation with the Maryland Commission on Disabilities and the 21 | |
140 | + | State Coordinating Committee for Human Services Transportation, solicit input and 22 | |
141 | + | comments from the public and riders of the Administration’s MobilityLink paratransit 23 | |
142 | + | service; and 24 | |
148 | 143 | ||
149 | - | (iii) the members of the Baltimore County D elegation to the | |
150 | - | Maryland General Assembly; and | |
144 | + | (7) develop recommendations for service improvements to the 25 | |
145 | + | Administration’s MobilityLink paratransit service, considering long–term costs and 26 | |
146 | + | benefits alongside a qualitative analysis to enhance the delivery of high–quality service to 27 | |
147 | + | MobilityLink riders; 28 4 SENATE BILL 891 | |
151 | 148 | ||
152 | - | (iv) the members of the Baltimore City Delegation to the Maryland | |
153 | - | General Assembly; | |
154 | 149 | ||
155 | - | (3) the County Executive and County Council of Anne Arundel County; | |
156 | 150 | ||
157 | - | (4) the County Executive and County Council of Baltimore County; and | |
151 | + | (8) develop recommendations for service improvements to individuals 1 | |
152 | + | located at least three–quarters of a mile from in areas outside of three–quarters of a mile of 2 | |
153 | + | a fixed transportation route; and 3 | |
158 | 154 | ||
159 | - | (5) the Maryland Department of Transportation; and | |
155 | + | (9) develop recommendations to address interjurisdictional restrictions to 4 | |
156 | + | paratransit services, including restrictions relating to medical appointments that cross 5 | |
157 | + | jurisdictional lines. 6 | |
160 | 158 | ||
161 | - | (5) (6) the Mayor and City Council of Baltimore City. | |
159 | + | (d) The Governor may include in the fiscal year 2026 budget bill an appropriation 7 | |
160 | + | of at least $150,000 for the purpose of carrying out the study required under subsection (b) 8 | |
161 | + | of this section. 9 | |
162 | 162 | ||
163 | - | SECTION 2. AND BE IT FURTHER ENACTED, That this Act shall take effect July | |
164 | - | 1, 2024. It shall remain effective for a period of 1 year and 6 months 2 years and, at the end | |
165 | - | of December 31, 2025 June 30, 2026, this Act, with no further action required by the | |
166 | - | General Assembly, shall be abrogated and of no further force and effect. | |
163 | + | (e) On or before July 1, 2025, the Maryland Transportation Institute shall submit 10 | |
164 | + | a report on its findings and recommendations to: 11 | |
167 | 165 | ||
168 | - | Approved by the Governor, May 9, 2024. | |
166 | + | (1) the Governor; 12 | |
167 | + | ||
168 | + | (2) in accordance with § 2–1257 of the State Government Article: 13 | |
169 | + | ||
170 | + | (i) the General Assembly; 14 | |
171 | + | ||
172 | + | (ii) the members of the Anne Arundel County Delegation to the 15 | |
173 | + | Maryland General Assembly; 16 | |
174 | + | ||
175 | + | (iii) the members of the Baltimore County Delegation to the 17 | |
176 | + | Maryland General Assembly; and 18 | |
177 | + | ||
178 | + | (iv) the members of the Baltimore City Delegation to the Maryland 19 | |
179 | + | General Assembly; 20 | |
180 | + | ||
181 | + | (3) the County Executive and County Council of Anne Arundel County; 21 | |
182 | + | ||
183 | + | (4) the County Executive and County Council of Baltimore County; and 22 | |
184 | + | ||
185 | + | (5) the Maryland Department of Transportation; and 23 | |
186 | + | ||
187 | + | (5) (6) the Mayor and City Council of Baltimore City. 24 | |
188 | + | ||
189 | + | SECTION 2. AND BE IT FURTHER ENACTED, That this Act shall take effect July 25 | |
190 | + | 1, 2024. It shall remain effective for a period of 1 year and 6 months 2 years and, at the end 26 | |
191 | + | of December 31, 2025 June 30, 2026, this Act, with no further action required by the 27 | |
192 | + | General Assembly, shall be abrogated and of no further force and effect. 28 |