Maryland 2025 Regular Session

Maryland House Bill HB456

Introduced
1/20/25  

Caption

Civil Actions - Child Nonsexual Abuse and Neglect - Damages and Statute of Limitations

Impact

The primary impact of HB 456 includes the modification of existing legal statutes concerning child neglect and nonsexual abuse cases. The legislation not only introduces a new deadline for filing claims but also addresses the limits on non-economic damages that can be awarded, setting a maximum of $1.5 million for situations that would have previously been barred by standard limitation periods. This aspect of the bill appears to respond to advocates' calls for ensuring that survivors of nonsexual abuse receive just compensation and have their day in court, regardless of when the incident occurred.

Summary

House Bill 456, titled 'Civil Actions – Child Nonsexual Abuse and Neglect – Damages and Statute of Limitations,' is a legislative proposal aimed at providing a framework for civil actions related to nonsexual child abuse and neglect. This bill establishes a statute of limitations for these types of actions, allowing claims to be filed within a defined period. Specifically, it stipulates a 20-year timeframe after the victim reaches the age of 18 or three years following a defendant's conviction for relevant crimes, thus giving victims a broader window to pursue legal remedies.

Contention

Despite its intentions, HB 456 presents areas of contention, particularly regarding the potential financial implications on state and local governments, as well as on educational boards and their liability insurance. Critics argue that the expanded liability could lead to a significant increase in lawsuits, which may affect taxpayers directly. Additionally, the thresholds for claiming damages, while providing robust protection for victims, may raise concerns about fiscal responsibility and the practicalities of adjudicating such cases to the detriment of public resources.

Notable_provisions

Furthermore, the bill also includes provisions concerning the retroactive application of the statute of limitations, which means it could revive previously barred claims. This move might be seen as controversial, inviting discussions about fairness to defendants versus the necessity to give justice to victims of childhood abuse. In doing so, HB 456 seeks to balance the scales of justice for vulnerable children and their families while navigating the complexities involved in civil litigation.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB402

Office of the Claimant Advocate and Stakeholder Advisory Group.

CA SB1384

Labor Commissioner: financially disabled persons: representation.

AZ HB2813

Erroneous convictions; compensation

CA AB401

Employment Development Department: language translations.

CA SB490

Victim compensation.

CA SB530

Exoneration: compensation.

CA SB975

Debt: coerced debts.

HI SB2340

Relating To Construction Defects.