Maryland Senate Bill SB297

Maryland 2025 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/10/25
• Refer: 1/10/25

Caption

Sign Language Interpreters - Licensing Requirement

Impact

The implementation of SB297 is expected to have a significant impact on the standards and practices surrounding sign language interpretation in Maryland. By requiring licensure, the bill aims to reduce the number of unqualified interpreters in the field, thereby improving service quality for consumers. Furthermore, this legislation aligns with broader public health and safety goals by ensuring that those who assist individuals with communication needs are adequately trained and certified, thereby facilitating better access and understanding across various sectors, including education and healthcare.

Context

Overall, SB297 reflects a proactive legislative approach to safeguarding the rights and needs of the deaf and hard-of-hearing community in Maryland. As the bill proceeds through the legislative process, discussions will likely continue around not only the requirements and standards set forth but also the implications for the workforce and the availability of qualified interpreters in various contexts.

Summary

Senate Bill 297 introduces a licensing requirement for individuals providing sign language interpretation services in Maryland. The bill mandates that, starting July 1, 2026, an individual must be licensed by the State Board of Sign Language Interpreters before offering sign language interpretation services or representing themselves as qualified to do so. This adjustment aims to ensure that individuals providing these essential services meet established professional standards, which is crucial for maintaining the quality and integrity of communication for the deaf and hard-of-hearing community.

Contention

While the bill presents many potential benefits, it may also raise concerns among certain stakeholders. Some individuals may fear that the licensing requirement could create barriers to entry into the interpretation field, particularly for those who are already providing services without formal certification. Additionally, the transition to a more regulated system may complicate matters for existing interpreters who do not have nationally recognized certifications, sparking debates about accessibility and the potential for increased costs associated with obtaining licensure.