Maryland 2025 Regular Session

Maryland Senate Bill SB405

Introduced
1/20/25  

Caption

Vehicle Laws - Fully Autonomous Vehicles - Human Safety Operators and Reporting Requirements

Impact

The legislation also introduces comprehensive reporting requirements for manufacturers of fully autonomous vehicles. They are required to report incidents involving collisions, traffic citations, disengagement events, and any incidents of assault or harassment involving passengers or operators. These reports must be submitted to the Motor Vehicle Administration, allowing for enhanced tracking and analysis of the safety and performance of autonomous vehicles. This provision seeks to improve accountability in the industry and facilitate data collection for further regulation and safety assessments.

Summary

Senate Bill 405, titled 'Vehicle Laws - Fully Autonomous Vehicles - Human Safety Operators and Reporting Requirements,' establishes regulations for the operation of fully autonomous vehicles within the state. The bill mandates that a human safety operator must be present in any fully autonomous vehicle with a gross weight of 10,001 pounds or more while it operates on public highways. This requirement aims to ensure that there is an individual capable of intervening in case of a technical failure or unsafe situation, thereby enhancing the safety of these vehicles in the operational environment.

Conclusion

In summary, Senate Bill 405 reflects an evolving landscape in transportation law, where rapid advancements in technology necessitate updated frameworks to ensure safety and accountability. With a focus on the presence of human oversight in operating autonomous vehicles and rigorous reporting standards for manufacturers, the bill aims to mitigate safety risks while enabling technological progress in the state. These developments will likely shape future legislative and regulatory actions concerning autonomous vehicle regulations.

Contention

While supporters of SB 405 argue that the requirements for human safety operators and strict incident reporting are essential for public safety, there is contention regarding the feasibility and implications for the development and adoption of autonomous vehicle technology. Critics might argue that the bill could inhibit innovation in the autonomous vehicle sector by imposing additional regulatory burdens, potentially slowing down the introduction of new technologies that could benefit transportation efficiency and safety in the long term. Thus, the balance between regulation and technological advancement remains a crucial topic of discussion among stakeholders.

Companion Bills

MD HB439

Crossfiled Vehicle Laws – Fully Autonomous Vehicles – Human Safety Operators and Reporting Requirements

Similar Bills

MD HB439

Vehicle Laws – Fully Autonomous Vehicles – Human Safety Operators and Reporting Requirements

CA AB3061

Vehicles: autonomous vehicle incident reporting.

CA AB2286

Vehicles: autonomous vehicles.

CA AB316

Vehicles: autonomous vehicles.

CA AB2638

Autonomous vehicles.

CA SB251

Autonomous vehicles: pilot project.

CA AB1444

Livermore Amador Valley Transit Authority: demonstration project.

CA AB399

Autonomous vehicles: Contra Costa Transportation Authority: pilot project.