Michigan House Bill HB4614

Michigan 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 5/23/23
• Refer: 5/23/23
• Report Pass: 10/24/23
• Engrossed: 2/7/24
• Refer: 2/13/24
• Report Pass: 6/13/24
• Refer: 6/13/24
• Report Pass: 6/18/24
• Enrolled: 6/25/24
• Chaptered: 7/30/24
• Passed: 7/30/24

Caption

Health occupations: emergency medical services personnel; certain temporary licenses; make technical changes. Amends 1978 PA 368 (MCL 333.1101 - 333.25211) by adding sec. 20952a. TIE BAR WITH: HB 4613'23

Impact

The passage of HB 4614 will significantly influence public health regulations in Michigan by enhancing the requirements for practicing EMS personnel. By enforcing direct supervision for temporary license holders, the bill reduces risks associated with inexperienced practitioners operating independently. This aligns with broader public health goals to ensure the competency of health service providers and protect patient safety. The amendment reflects a proactive approach to managing the training and integration of new EMS workers into the health care system, particularly in emergency situations where timely and effective responses are crucial.

Summary

House Bill 4614 amends the existing legislation governing public health in Michigan to introduce specific regulations related to the practice of emergency medical services (EMS) personnel who hold temporary licenses. The bill outlines that individuals with temporary licenses must operate under the direct supervision of licensed professionals, promoting a structured and supervised practice environment for new EMS personnel. This aims to bolster the standards of care and safety in emergency medical scenarios, ensuring that inexperienced practitioners perform their duties within the guidance of fully licensed professionals.

Sentiment

The sentiment around HB 4614 appears largely supportive, especially among stakeholders concerned about public safety and the integrity of emergency medical services. Legislators and health advocacy groups emphasize the importance of strict supervision in protecting the welfare of patients and ensuring high-quality care. However, there may be some contention among practitioners who might feel constrained by the supervision requirement, preferring greater autonomy in practical experience. Overall, the sentiment underscores a commitment to improving health standards within Michigan's emergency medical response framework.

Contention

While there is broad agreement on the necessity of supervision for temporary EMS licenses, discussions revealed potential concerns regarding the balance between adequate oversight and the need for practitioners to gain independent experience. Critics may argue that overly stringent supervision could hinder the development of competency in real-world environments. Furthermore, the bill's tie to another piece of legislation, HB 4613, indicates ongoing discussions concerning the broader implications of these changes and how they integrate with existing health regulations.