Michigan House Bill HB4929

Michigan 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 11/7/24
• Refer: 8/23/23
• Engrossed: 11/9/23
• Refer: 11/14/23
• Report Pass: 6/6/24
• Refer: 6/6/24
• Report Pass: 10/8/24
• Enrolled: 11/7/24
• Chaptered: 12/10/24
• Passed: 12/10/24

Caption

Traffic control: civil infraction procedures; revised judicature act; revise to reflect distribution of certain fines to school districts. Amends secs. 8379 & 8396 of 1961 PA 236 (MCL 600.8379 & 600.8396). TIE BAR WITH: HB 4928'23, HB 4930'23

Impact

The proposed amendments to sections 8379 and 8396 of the Revised Judicature Act would influence how municipalities and counties receive funds from civil infractions. The bill introduces the requirement that a certain percentage of fines collected from civil infractions is directed to libraries and other local governmental purposes. As such, it addresses concerns about the revenue generated from penalties and how that revenue can be used to benefit local communities, particularly in enhancing public services like libraries.

Summary

House Bill 4929 aims to amend the statutes governing the organization and jurisdiction of Michigan's courts, specifically enhancing the procedures around civil infraction fines. The bill proposes changes to how fines and costs assessed in district courts are distributed, delineating the allocation of funds to local government units and library purposes. By specifying that fines for civil infractions related to traffic violations be channeled accordingly, the bill seeks to ensure a more structured approach in the enforcement and financial implications of civil infractions under the Michigan vehicle code.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 4929 can be characterized as cautiously supportive among some lawmakers, particularly those recognizing the need for clarity and fairness in the distribution of fines. While there is acknowledgment of the advantages of structured fund distribution, concerns are prevalent regarding potential disparities in how different districts may be affected by these changes. Lawmakers advocating for the bill view it as a necessary step to create fairness in the system, while others remain skeptical about its effectiveness in achieving the intended outcomes.

Contention

A point of contention involves the distribution formula for fines, which may not equally favor all urban and rural areas. Critics of the bill argue that the changes could exacerbate existing inequalities in how judicial revenues are allocated, further marginalizing smaller communities. The discussions surrounding the bill highlight the broader debate about local governance and financial sustainability within the context of judicial fines. Additionally, the effectiveness of fines as a deterrent for traffic violations and infraction compliance is also a topic of concern among opponents of the bill.