Michigan House Bill HB5434

Michigan 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 9/25/24
• Refer: 2/13/24
• Report Pass: 2/27/24
• Engrossed: 5/7/24
• Refer: 5/9/24
• Report Pass: 9/19/24
• Refer: 9/19/24
• Report Pass: 9/25/24
• Enrolled: 9/25/24
• Chaptered: 10/15/24
• Passed: 10/15/24

Caption

Highways: memorial; portion of M-11; designate as the "Korean War Veterans Memorial Drive". Amends 2001 PA 142 (MCL 250.1001 - 250.2092) by adding sec. 114.

Impact

If enacted, this bill would influence state laws concerning the naming of highways by incorporating memorial designations into the regulatory framework. It adds a specific section to the Public Acts of 2001, demonstrating the legislature's intent to honor veterans more formally. This could pave the way for additional highways or public places to be similarly named in recognition of military service, thereby enhancing the presence of veteran recognition in public spaces throughout Michigan.

Summary

House Bill 5434 amends the existing legislation concerning the naming of certain Michigan highways by designating a section of highway M-11 in Kent County as the 'Korean War Veterans Memorial Drive.' This bill illustrates the state's recognition of the sacrifices made by veterans, particularly those who served in the Korean War, by establishing a memorial drive that honors their service. The measure aims to raise awareness of the historical significance of this conflict and provide a permanent tribute to the veterans who fought in it.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding the bill appears to be broadly positive, reflecting a shared respect for military service members. The unanimous decision during the voting process, where 38 votes were in favor, indicates strong bipartisan support for the measure. This alignment suggests an acknowledgment of the importance of memorializing sacrifices made by veterans, although it also highlights a broader sentiment common in discussions about veterans' issues—recognition and respect.

Contention

While there were no significant points of contention noted in the voting records or discussions, it is important to recognize that such bills can sometimes prompt dialogue about resource allocation for veteran services. Community members and advocacy groups may express views on whether the focus should be on physical memorials or on providing more substantive support to veterans. Nevertheless, in this case, HB5434 appears to have garnered smooth passage without notable opposition.