Michigan Senate Bill SB0014

Michigan 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/17/23
• Refer: 1/17/23
• Report Pass: 4/25/23
• Refer: 4/25/23
• Report Pass: 5/16/23
• Engrossed: 5/17/23
• Refer: 5/17/23
• Report Pass: 6/22/23
• Enrolled: 6/28/23
• Chaptered: 8/22/23
• Passed: 8/22/23

Caption

Administrative procedure: rules; prohibition on adoption of rules by state agencies from being more stringent than federal regulations; eliminate. Amends secs. 32 & 45 of 1969 PA 306 (MCL 24.232 & 24.245).

Impact

The implications of SB 0014 on state laws are significant, as it effectively prevents state agencies from imposing stricter regulations than their federal counterparts. This change could lead to a reduction in the state's regulatory burden on businesses and individuals, potentially fostering a more business-friendly environment. However, it also raises the concern that important state-specific regulations that protect public welfare or the environment might be undermined if they are perceived to exceed federal requirements.

Summary

Senate Bill 0014 seeks to amend the procedures governing state agencies in Michigan, specifically addressing the adoption of rules. The bill prohibits state agencies from enacting rules that are more stringent than existing federal regulations. This legislative approach aims to streamline agency operations and align state rules more closely with federal standards, promoting consistency in regulatory practices across jurisdictions.

Sentiment

Overall sentiment regarding SB 0014 appears to be mixed. Proponents argue that the bill will enhance efficiency in regulatory processes and simplify compliance for businesses operating in Michigan. Meanwhile, critics express concerns that reliance on federal standards may compromise the state's ability to address unique local issues effectively, thereby reducing protections that citizens currently enjoy. The sentiment reflects the ongoing debate over the appropriate balance between federal oversight and state autonomy.

Contention

One notable point of contention surrounding SB 0014 is the potential impact on small businesses and varying stakeholder interests. While proponents highlight the benefits of reduced regulatory overhead, opponents warn that eliminating the ability for state agencies to tailor regulations could lead to a 'one-size-fits-all' approach that fails to account for the particular needs of Michigan's diverse communities. The bill illustrates the ongoing tension between regulatory standardization and the necessity for localized governance.