Michigan Senate Bill SB0472

Michigan 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 9/7/23
• Refer: 9/7/23
• Report Pass: 10/3/23
• Refer: 10/3/23
• Report Pass: 10/11/23
• Engrossed: 10/11/23
• Refer: 10/11/23
• Report Pass: 10/17/23

Caption

Crimes: weapons; sentencing guidelines; update. Amends sec. 16m, ch. XVII of 1927 PA 175 (MCL 777.16m). TIE BAR WITH: SB 0471'23

Impact

The implications of SB0472 would be significant for individuals convicted of firearm-related crimes in Michigan. By updating the sentencing guidelines, the bill could lead to longer prison terms for offenders and potentially serve as a deterrent against unlawful firearm sales, possession, and use. This amendment is designed to tighten regulations on firearms and address issues related to gun violence, thereby enhancing the state's criminal justice framework on public safety.

Summary

Senate Bill 472 (SB0472) aims to amend the Michigan Code of Criminal Procedure, specifically targeting sentencing guidelines associated with various firearm-related offenses. This legislation incorporates changes to section 16m of chapter XVII of 1927 PA 175 and aligns with previously enacted law under Senate Bill 471. By modifying the categorization and maximum sentences for specific felonies regarding firearms, the bill seeks to enhance penalties for serious violations, thereby potentially increasing public safety measures in Michigan.

Sentiment

The overall sentiment surrounding SB0472 appears to align with a manner of increased public support for stricter firearm regulations. Advocates of the bill argue that toughening consequences for those who violate firearm laws is essential in today's context of rising violence and unlawful use of weapons. However, there may also be voices against the legislation, suggesting concerns about the effectiveness of increased penalties and their disproportionate impact on certain communities.

Contention

Notable points of contention regarding SB0472 may include discussions around the fairness and efficacy of increased sentencing for firearm-related offenses, especially in relation to potential disparities in enforcement based on socioeconomic factors. Additionally, there are concerns that harsher penalties may not address the root causes of gun violence or contribute to meaningful changes in behavior among offenders. The debate around this bill highlights the complexity and sensitivity of firearm legislation in balancing public safety and individual rights.