Michigan House Bill HB4502

Michigan 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 5/15/25
• Refer: 5/15/25

Caption

Occupations: accounting; qualifications for certified public accountants; revise. Amends secs. 725 & 727a of 1980 PA 299 (MCL 339.725 & 339.727a).

Note

Overall, HB 4502 is significant in that it seeks to modernize and strengthen the CPA certification process in Michigan. By establishing clear standards for education and experience, the bill aims to enhance the integrity and professionalism within the accounting sector.

Impact

One of the primary impacts of HB 4502 is the adjustment in the experience requirements for CPA certification. The bill specifies that applicants must accumulate at least one year of qualifying experience verified by an existing CPA. This amendment seeks to enhance the quality of professionals entering the field by ensuring that they have practical, relevant experience. Additionally, it introduces provisions for individuals whose principal place of business is not in Michigan, allowing them to practice without a formal certificate if they meet equivalent qualifications from other jurisdictions.

Summary

House Bill 4502 seeks to amend the 1980 Occupational Code in Michigan, specifically targeting the qualifications required for individuals seeking certification as certified public accountants (CPAs). The bill aims to revise the educational, examination, and experience prerequisites necessary for individuals applying for CPA certification, ensuring they possess adequate knowledge and proficiency in accounting practices. It emphasizes the importance of meeting standardized criteria to maintain fairness and consistency in the profession across the state.

Contention

Discussion surrounding HB 4502 may involve debates about the accessibility of the profession, with some arguing that heightened requirements could limit entry into the accounting field. Opponents of the bill may express concerns that the increased emphasis on experience could disproportionately affect individuals from diverse backgrounds, particularly those seeking to enter the field through non-traditional educational paths. This potential contention reflects broader issues of inclusivity in professional licensing.