Michigan Senate Bill SB0476

Michigan 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 7/1/25
• Refer: 7/1/25

Caption

Health occupations: health professionals; definition of invasive bodily examination; add. Amends secs. 16105 & 16106 of 1978 PA 368 (MCL 333.16105 & 333.16106). TIE BAR WITH: SB 0475'25

Impact

The bill's impact on state laws primarily revolves around the enhanced clarity it brings to the Public Health Code concerning health professions and the actions defined under 'invasive bodily examination.' By establishing clear definitions, the bill aims to ensure that health professionals operate within defined guidelines, which is vital for public safety and professional accountability. Additionally, it also clarifies the licensing processes for health professionals and the parameters under which they practice, potentially affecting the education and certification required for various health professions.

Context

The bill is to be enacted alongside Senate Bill 0475, functioning together under the provisions needed for comprehensive reform in the health profession landscape in Michigan. The connection between these two bills indicates broader legislative efforts aimed at updating and refining health regulations, ultimately tailored to improve health care delivery while maintaining established standards.

Summary

Senate Bill 0476 aims to amend the Public Health Code in Michigan, specifically focusing on the definitions related to health occupations and health professions. The primary amendments are found in sections 16105 and 16106, where the bill clarifies terms that are crucial for understanding health professions, including definitions for 'health occupation,' 'health profession,' and 'invasive bodily examination.' These definitions are key to delineating the scope of practice for various licensed health care providers.

Contention

A notable point of contention surrounding SB 0476 arises from the implications of the defined 'invasive bodily examination,' which includes sensitive procedures such as pelvic, vaginal, rectal, and prostate examinations. The concern is that the bill may lead to restrictive interpretations of health practice that could impact how health professionals are able to interact with patients during these examinations. Some stakeholders express worries that the language may inadvertently limit the practices of certain health professionals, particularly in specialized fields, or create barriers to adequate patient care.