COMMITTEE ON LEGISLATIVE RESEARCH
OVERSIGHT DIVISION
FISCAL NOTE
L.R. No.:1229S.02P Bill No.:Perfected SS for SB 222 Subject:Cities, Towns, and Villages; Counties; County Government; Landlords and
Tenants; Political Subdivisions
Type:Original Date:March 28, 2023Bill Summary:This proposal establishes provisions relating to landlord-tenant proceedings.
FISCAL SUMMARY
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON GENERAL REVENUE FUNDFUND AFFECTEDFY 2024FY 2025FY 2026Total Estimated Net
Effect on General
Revenue $0$0$0
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON OTHER STATE FUNDSFUND AFFECTEDFY 2024FY 2025FY 2026Total Estimated Net
Effect on Other State
Funds $0$0$0
Numbers within parentheses: () indicate costs or losses. L.R. No. 1229S.02P
Bill No. Perfected SS for SB 222
Page 2 of
March 28, 2023
KB:LR:OD
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON FEDERAL FUNDSFUND AFFECTEDFY 2024FY 2025FY 2026Total Estimated Net
Effect on All Federal
Funds $0$0$0
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON FULL TIME EQUIVALENT (FTE)FUND AFFECTEDFY 2024FY 2025FY 2026Total Estimated Net
Effect on FTE 000
☐ Estimated Net Effect (expenditures or reduced revenues) expected to exceed $250,000 in any
of the three fiscal years after implementation of the act or at full implementation of the act.
☐ Estimated Net Effect (savings or increased revenues) expected to exceed $250,000 in any of
the three fiscal years after implementation of the act or at full implementation of the act.
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON LOCAL FUNDSFUND AFFECTEDFY 2024FY 2025FY 2026Local Government$0$0$0 L.R. No. 1229S.02P
Bill No. Perfected SS for SB 222
Page 3 of
March 28, 2023
KB:LR:OD
FISCAL ANALYSIS
ASSUMPTION
Officials from the Office of the State Courts Administrator and Department of Commerce
and Insurance each assume the proposal will have no fiscal impact on their respective
organizations. Oversight does not have any information to the contrary. Therefore, Oversight
will reflect a zero impact in the fiscal note for these agencies.
In response to a similar proposal from 2022 (SB 1044), officials from the Attorney General’s
Office
Officials from the City of Jefferson assume there could be a fiscal impact if a court were to
vacate a judgement a municipality has on a property as a result of the referenced court hearing.
If a municipality had to hire an attorney to assist with such a court action, there could be a small
fiscal impact.
Officials from the City of Kansas City and the City of Springfield each assume the proposal
will have no fiscal impact on their respective organizations.
Oversight notes that the above mentioned agencies have stated the proposal would not have a
direct fiscal impact on their respective organizations. Oversight does not have any information
to the contrary. Therefore, Oversight will reflect a zero impact on the fiscal note.
Oversight only reflects the responses received from state agencies and political subdivisions;
however, other cities and counties were requested to respond to this proposed legislation but did
not. A listing of political subdivisions included in the Missouri Legislative Information System
(MOLIS) database is available upon request.
Senate Amendment 1
Oversight assumes there will be no fiscal impact due to this amendment.
FISCAL IMPACT – State GovernmentFY 2024
(10 Mo.)
FY 2025FY 2026$0$0$0 L.R. No. 1229S.02P
Bill No. Perfected SS for SB 222
Page 4 of
March 28, 2023
KB:LR:OD
FISCAL IMPACT – Local GovernmentFY 2024
(10 Mo.)
FY 2025FY 2026$0$0$0
FISCAL IMPACT – Small Business
Small business landlords could be positively impacted as a result of this proposal.
FISCAL DESCRIPTION
The proposed legislation appears to have no direct fiscal impact.
This legislation is not federally mandated, would not duplicate any other program and would not
require additional capital improvements or rental space.
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
Office of the State Courts Administrator
Attorney General’s Office
Department of Commerce and Insurance
City of Kansas City
City of Springfield
City of Jefferson
Julie MorffRoss StropeDirectorAssistant DirectorMarch 28, 2023March 28, 2023