Prohibits the enforcement of any federal regulation by a state department or agency until the enforcement is approved by the General Assembly
Impact
By repealing certain existing regulations and requiring reviews of federal rules by an established committee, SB358 alters the dynamics of state-federal relations. It restricts the automatic application of federal rules, which could lead to delays in enforcement and create inconsistencies in regulatory practices. This legislative move raises questions regarding the relationship between state and federal law, particularly in areas critical to public welfare and compliance.
Summary
Senate Bill 358 introduces significant changes to how federal regulations are enforced at the state level in Missouri. The bill mandates that no federal regulation may be enforced by state departments and agencies unless it receives prior approval from the state General Assembly. This provision aims to fortify state sovereignty by ensuring that the legislative body reviews and approves all federal mandates before they can be implemented within the state’s jurisdiction. The measure is rooted in the belief that the state must maintain its independence and resist federal overreach.
Sentiment
The sentiment surrounding SB358 appears to be polarized. Proponents argue that the bill is a necessary step towards protecting state autonomy, allowing the General Assembly to maintain control over regulations that affect residents and businesses in Missouri. Conversely, critics contend that this shift towards requiring legislative approval for enforcement could hinder effective governance and cause complications by delaying the implementation of vital federal regulations.
Contention
Key points of contention include concerns about the potential backlog in regulation reviews as the General Assembly may not have the capacity to thoroughly scrutinize all federal regulations in a timely manner. Critics argue that such a system may undermine public safety and welfare by delaying the enforcement of regulations designed to protect citizens. Furthermore, while supporters emphasize the need for oversight to counteract federal encroachment, opponents are wary of the administrative challenges and potential inefficiencies the bill could create.
Prohibiting the enforcement of federal rules or regulations and the promulgation of state rules and regulations to carry out such enforcement without legislative approval.
Campaign finance: contributions and expenditures; provision related to officeholders raising funds when facing a recall; modify, and require candidate to establish a separate account used for recall purposes. Amends secs. 3, 11, 12, 21, 24 & 52 of 1976 PA 388 (MCL 169.203 et seq.) & adds sec. 21b.
Campaign finance: contributions and expenditures; funds donated to a candidate for recall efforts; require candidate to establish a separate account used for recall purposes. Amends secs. 3, 11, 12, 21, 24 & 52 of 1976 PA 388 (MCL 169.203 et seq.) & adds sec. 21b.
A concurrent resolution recognizing wild rice as sacred and central to the culture and health of Indigenous Peoples in Minnesota and critical to the health and identity of all Minnesota citizens and ecosystems and establishing a commitment to passing legislation to protect wild rice and the freshwater resources upon which it depends.