Modifies provisions relating to fees and expenses for an interpreter or translator in certain proceedings
The most significant change brought about by HB182 is the clarification of payment responsibilities for interpreter services in legal settings. If a party in a criminal proceeding requires an interpreter, the state will cover the costs from appropriated funds. For cases outside of this provision, the fees and expenses can be passed onto the parties involved, and the court may require a deposit beforehand. This shift aims to ensure that the necessary resources for fair legal proceedings are available while balancing the costs amongst involved parties.
House Bill 182 aims to modify existing provisions related to the fees and expenses that can be claimed by interpreters and translators in civil, juvenile, and criminal proceedings. The bill introduces specific guidelines regarding what constitutes reasonable fees and how these should be compensated. It states that interpreters and translators will be entitled to a reasonable fee approved by the court, along with travel expenses not exceeding state rates. Importantly, it specifies that interpreters will not be compensated for travel time, which could impact the overall financial expectations for service providers in these roles.
While the bill seeks to streamline funding for interpreter and translator services, it may raise questions regarding its implications for those who provide such services, especially concerning the non-compensation for travel time. Critics might argue that this could disincentivize skilled professionals from operating in the legal landscape due to financial constraints. Furthermore, there might be discussions around the adequacy of 'reasonable fees' as determined by the court, potentially leading to discrepancies in compensation practices that could undermine the availability and quality of language services in legal contexts.