Proposes a constitutional amendment relating to firearms
Impact
The adoption of HJR17 would fundamentally alter existing powers within the state's constitution relating to gun ownership and regulation. The new section proposed by HJR17 would affirm the rights of individuals to carry and possess firearms, simultaneously restricting the ability of the state to impose significant limitations on these rights. This could lead to legal challenges and pushback both from those advocating for gun control measures and those opposed to any regulations on firearms. Should it pass, this amendment may set a precedent for other states reviewing their own gun regulations in the context of constitutional rights.
Summary
House Joint Resolution 17 (HJR17) proposes a constitutional amendment concerning firearms by repealing Section 23 of Article I of the Missouri Constitution and adopting a new section in its place. This amendment emphasizes the right of citizens to keep and bear arms, including ammunition and accessories. The resolution underscores the unalienable nature of this right and mandates that any restrictions on these rights must be subject to strict scrutiny, placing the responsibility on the state to protect against infringements. This proposal aligns closely with Second Amendment rights, as it seeks to safeguard individual freedoms related to firearms ownership within Missouri.
Contention
Notable points of contention surrounding HJR17 include concerns that the amendment might undermine local governance ability to regulate firearms within their jurisdictions. Critics of the proposition argue that the proposed changes could hinder efforts to introduce reasonable firearm safety regulations and could lead to an increase in gun violence. Additionally, various advocacy groups may mobilize against the amendment, asserting that it does not take into account the complexity of gun violence and the need for potential legislative oversight. The passage of HJR17 could fuel intense debates both within the legislature and in public spheres as individuals and groups assess the implications of such broad rights concerning firearms.