Missouri 2025 Regular Session

Missouri Senate Bill SB313

Introduced
1/8/25  

Caption

Modifies provisions relating to court procedure, including the admissibility of expert testimony evidence and Supreme Court Rule 52.08 relating to class actions

Impact

The impact of SB 313 on state laws is substantial, particularly in the realms of judicial proceedings involving expert witnesses and class action lawsuits. By instituting clearer guidelines for expert testimony, it aims to bolster the quality and clarity of evidence presented in court, which could streamline cases and promote more informed jury decisions. Additionally, the adjustments to Rule 52.08 will modernize the class action certification process, ensuring that class members' interests are adequately protected while also defining the responsibilities of class counsel, which may enhance the effectiveness of class suits within the Missouri judiciary.

Summary

Senate Bill 313 proposes significant modifications to court procedures in Missouri, specifically focused on the admissibility of expert testimony and amendments to Supreme Court Rule 52.08 regarding class actions. The bill emphasizes the importance of expert testimony in legal proceedings, stating that qualified individuals may provide opinions in court if their expertise can assist in understanding relevant evidence or determining factual issues. Furthermore, the bill clarifies the foundation required for such testimonies, intending to streamline the process in which expert evidence is presented and evaluated by the trier of fact.

Contention

While SB 313 seeks to strengthen the judicial process, it has garnered contention regarding the implications of expert reliance and the class action reforms. Critics argue that the requirements imposed on expert testimony could unduly complicate the admission of valuable inputs while favoring larger entities with resources to hire expert witnesses. Furthermore, the modifications to class action protocols may raise concerns about access to justice for average citizens, as the redefined rules could potentially limit participation in class actions, making it more challenging for individuals to collectively pursue claims against larger corporations.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB1707

Health professionals and facilities: adverse actions based on another state’s law.

CA SB616

Enforcement of money judgments: exemptions.

CA SB1477

Enforcement of judgments: wage garnishment.

WV HB4712

Require the prompt enrollment in payment plans for costs, fines, forfeitures, restitution, or penalties in circuit court and magistrate court

CA AB2477

Property crimes: unlawful entry onto property.

WV HB4423

To allow West Virginia Magistrate Courts to more easily recover payments owed to them.

CA SB194

Probation: revocation: new period.

CA AB1827

Criminal procedure: high-risk parolees.