Missouri 2025 Regular Session

Missouri Senate Bill SJR30

Introduced
1/8/25  

Caption

Modifies process for proposing and approving constitutional amendments

Impact

The proposed changes outlined in SJR30 are intended to make the process of proposing amendments more transparent and accountable to the voters of Missouri. By mandating that all proposed amendments be subjected to voter review and comment before they appear on ballots, stakeholders argue this will foster greater civic engagement and ensure that the voices of constituents in various congressional districts are heard. Furthermore, the requirement for majority approval of amendments not only statewide but also across a majority of congressional districts seeks to prevent any amendment from passing merely due to dominance in a particular area, thereby promoting a more equitable representation of the electorate's will.

Summary

SJR30, also known as Senate Joint Resolution No. 30, proposes significant modifications to the process by which constitutional amendments are proposed and approved in Missouri. The resolution seeks to repeal specific sections of the current Constitution and replace them with new stipulations that mostly center around increasing voter oversight and restricting certain types of funding for amendments. Notably, it aims to bar foreign governments and political entities from contributing financially to initiatives aimed at amending the state Constitution. This measure is designed to enhance the integrity of the democratic process and ensure that local interests are not unduly influenced by outside actors.

Contention

There are potential points of contention surrounding SJR30, particularly regarding its imposition of stricter rules on how constitutional amendments can be funded and submitted for public vote. Critics may view these provisions as overly restrictive, potentially hampering legitimate initiatives that require funding and support for effective voter engagement. Additionally, there could be concerns about the proposed requirement for voter reviews of amendments, which some may argue could introduce unnecessary delays in the amendment process, complicating the path to necessary reforms.

Final_notes

Overall, SJR30 reflects a legislative effort to fortify the constitutional amendment process in Missouri, striving for a balance between voter engagement and safeguarding against external influence in state governance. As with any change to foundational legal processes, the ramifications of these proposals will play a crucial role in shaping the future political landscape of Missouri.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

HI SB1225

Proposing An Amendment To Article Xvii, Section 3 Of The Hawaii Constitution To Specify That The Standard For Voter Approval Of A Constitutional Amendment Proposed By The Legislature Is A Majority Of All The Votes Tallied Upon The Question.

AZ HCR2049

Sovereign authority

CA SR30

Relative to Constitution Week.

NJ ACR81

Proposes amendment to constitution regarding parental notification for medical or surgical procedures or treatments relating to pregnancy to be performed on minor children.

TX HB74

Relating to the Texas Balance of Powers Act.

TX HB98

Relating to the Texas Balance of Powers Act.

AR SB569

An Amendment To The Arkansas Constitution Concerning Ballot Titles Of Proposed Measures; And Amending The Arkansas Constitution Under The Authority Of Arkansas Constitution, Article 5, Section 1.

HI SB311

Proposing An Amendment To The Hawaii State Constitution Regarding The Freedom Of Speech.