Proposes amendment to Constitution permitting justices and judges to engage in extra-judicial activities for compensation as permitted by court rule.
Impact
This proposed amendment would significantly alter the current limitations imposed on judges in New Jersey. By allowing judges to earn additional income through regulated activities, it aims to adapt to contemporary practices and acknowledge the diverse contributions judges may make outside of their judicial responsibilities. However, it also raises questions about the potential impacts on judicial impartiality and the integrity of the judicial system, as outside compensation could be perceived as conflicting with a judge's primary role.
Summary
ACR121 proposes a constitutional amendment allowing State Supreme Court Justices and Superior Court Judges in New Jersey to participate in extra-judicial activities for compensation as permitted by court rule. Currently, judges are barred from engaging in the practice of law or other gainful pursuits while in office. The amendment seeks to revise this restriction, enabling judges to earn supplemental income through activities defined and regulated by the Supreme Court, provided that such compensation does not exceed 15% of their annual salary.
Contention
The discussion surrounding ACR121 may involve concerns about the appropriateness of judges engaging in outside activities for compensation. Critics might argue that allowing judges to earn additional income could undermine public trust in the judiciary, introducing a perception of bias or compromised objectivity. Supporters, on the other hand, may assert that regulated extra-judicial work can enhance the judges' expertise and serve the public while maintaining necessary ethical boundaries. Ultimately, ACR121 reflects an evolving view on the roles and limitations of judicial figures in modern society.
Proposes constitutional amendment reducing initial appointed terms of Supreme Court justices, abolishing their reappointment with tenure, and establishing retention elections to serve additional terms.
Proposes constitutional amendment to eliminate judicial review of arbitration rulings in disputes between Judiciary and county concerning court facilities.
Proposes constitutional amendment to eliminate judicial review of arbitration rulings in disputes between Judiciary and county concerning court facilities.
Proposes constitutional amendment to eliminate judicial review of arbitration rulings in disputes between Judiciary and county concerning court facilities.
Renames the judicial nominating commission as the commission on judicial nominations and qualifications. Provides that one commission member is selected by attorneys licensed in Indiana, one commission member is appointed by the speaker of the house of representatives, and one commission member is appointed by the president pro tempore of the senate. Requires that, of the three members appointed by the governor, at least one commission member must be an attorney. Prohibits a person who is a lobbyist from serving on the commission. Provides for the governor to fill a vacancy on the supreme court or the court of appeals
Proposes constitutional amendment reducing initial appointed terms of Supreme Court justices, abolishing their reappointment with tenure, and establishing retention elections to serve additional terms.