New Jersey Senate Bill S157

New Jersey 2022-2023 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/11/22
• Refer: 1/11/22

Caption

Bars companies which hire illegal aliens from public contracts, grants, loans, or tax incentives for seven years.

Impact

The implications of S157 are fairly extensive, establishing a precedent for stricter employment verification processes among businesses seeking to engage with state resources. By defining 'public body' to encompass a range of governmental entities, the bill effectively broadens its reach. Companies found in violation face penalties of $10,000 for each illegal alien they hire, which would also support the state’s regulatory framework regarding lawful employment practices. This act could encourage local businesses to enhance their hiring practices to avoid severe penalties and the accompanying repercussions on their operational eligibility.

Summary

Senate Bill S157 aims to impose significant sanctions on companies that hire illegal aliens. Specifically, the bill states that any company employing an individual lacking legal authorization to work in the U.S. will be barred from entering into contracts with public bodies for seven years. These sanctions extend to various forms of engagements, including contracts for construction work and agreements concerning supplies and services, as well as any applicable grants or tax incentives. Through this measure, the legislation targets practices perceived as undermining legal employment standards within the state.

Contention

S157 has faced notable contention in discussions surrounding immigration enforcement and economic implications. Advocates argue that the bill promotes fair labor practices and ensures that public funds are only allocated to legally compliant businesses. However, opponents criticize the bill as potentially creating job losses and fostering economic challenges by unduly penalizing businesses for hiring practices that might not involve malicious intent. Furthermore, concerns regarding the bill's enforcement ramifications and its impacts on local economies are pivotal issues raised by its detractors.