Urges Governor and DOH to include "at-risk infants or toddlers" in New Jersey Early Intervention System.
The resolution is positioned to potentially amend state laws governing early childhood intervention. By incorporating at-risk infants, it seeks to tackle long-term developmental challenges that these vulnerable groups may face if early assistance is not granted. Incorporating at-risk classifications could yield favorable outcomes in education and social integration, as early intervention services include important therapies aimed at addressing developmental delays. This could ultimately reduce future costs associated with remedial education and healthcare, making a strong case for preventive action.
Senate Concurrent Resolution No. 43 (SCR43) urges the Governor of New Jersey and the Department of Health (DOH) to include 'at-risk infants or toddlers' within the New Jersey Early Intervention System (NJEIS). It builds on federal law established under Part C of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), which permits states to expand eligibility for early developmental services. The NJEIS currently provides crucial services to infants and toddlers but does not extend these benefits to those classified as at-risk due to moderating factors such as serious neonatal illness, homelessness, low birth weight, and instances of abuse or neglect.
In summary, SCR43 aims to reflect an understanding of the complexities surrounding infant development by modifying the eligibility criteria within the NJEIS. The resolution advocates for proactive measures to ensure that at-risk children receive the early support they need to thrive, ensuring they are better prepared for future educational opportunities and minimizing societal costs in the long run.
Notably, the issue of maternal postpartum depression is highlighted as a significant factor contributing to developmental delays. Medical studies indicate correlations between untreated postpartum depression and delays in motor and cognitive skills among infants. The historical exclusion of at-risk infants from intervention programs is met with concern, given the prevalent health issues among these populations. Some stakeholders argue that expanding eligibility could impose additional costs on the system, while others emphasize the long-term savings associated with early intervention.