Requires State employees to be trained in disability law and etiquette.
The introduction of this bill will have significant implications for state law, specifically relating to the employment and operational procedures within state government agencies. The requirement for training will not only enhance the understanding of disability etiquette among employees but will also contribute to a broader culture of compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). This proactive approach aims to minimize discriminatory practices against individuals with disabilities, fostering a more equitable working environment.
If enacted, Bill S1750 will require state government employers to establish and maintain a comprehensive training program for all employees on disability laws and etiquette, contributing towards creating awareness and fostering a respectful environment. The comprehensive nature of this training is designed to ensure that a structured approach to disability awareness is adopted and upheld within the state's workforce.
Bill S1750, sponsored by Senator Paul D. Moriarty, mandates that State employees in New Jersey undergo training focused on disability laws and etiquette. The principal aim of the bill is to foster an inclusive environment within state government facilities by ensuring that employees are well-versed in the treatment and accommodation of individuals with intellectual, developmental, and physical disabilities. The training program is to be established by the State Treasurer in coordination with the Commissioner of Human Services, ensuring it aligns with current laws and best practices.
While the bill has garnered support for its objectives, there may be points of contention regarding the implementation and adequacy of resources allocated for such training. Critics may raise concerns about the financial implications of the training programs and whether state agencies have the capacity to administer ongoing training as outlined. Furthermore, the requirement for biennial retraining could be viewed as an additional burden on state employees who might already be balancing various responsibilities.