Increases traffic threshold for local installation of certain speed humps on certain local streets without DOT approval.
The implications of SB 3968 are significant for local governments, which will have more autonomy in deciding how to manage vehicular traffic on their roads. By increasing the allowable traffic limit for speed humps from previously established figures, the bill seeks to empower local authorities to act swiftly in areas where traffic safety is a concern, particularly near schools. This could lead to a more efficient implementation of safety measures, reducing bureaucratic delays that previously accompanied the approval process. Additionally, it addresses community safety needs in residential neighborhoods by encouraging the construction of speed humps without mandatory state oversight.
Senate Bill 3968 addresses the installation of speed humps by counties and municipalities on local roadways. The bill amends existing legislation to increase the daily traffic threshold for certain traffic calming measures, allowing jurisdictions to construct speed humps on roads that accommodate fewer than 4,000 vehicles per day. This change applies specifically to two-lane residential streets and is aimed at making it easier for municipalities and counties to implement safety measures without needing approval from the Commissioner of Transportation. The primary focus is on enhancing vehicular safety in residential areas and near schools by facilitating the installation of speed humps as a traffic calming measure.
However, there are points of contention that may emerge as this bill is considered. Critics may voice concerns regarding the potential for inconsistent implementation of traffic calming measures across different municipalities and the adequacy of local assessments regarding road safety. There may also be debates about the effectiveness of speed humps and similar measures in genuinely improving road safety without causing other issues, such as increased noise from decelerating vehicles or potential inconveniences for residents. The balance between enhancing local control and maintaining statewide transportation standards could be a focal point of legislative discussions.